next up [*] print clean
Next: BACKGROUND Up: Table of Contents

 

STANFORD EXPLORATION PROJECT

Gabriel Alvarez, Brad Artman, James Berryman, Biondo Biondi, Morgan Brown, Weitian Chen, Jon Claerbout, Marie Clapp, Robert Clapp, John Etgen, Christopher Liner, Jesse Lomask, Steven Pride, Daniel Rosales, Paul Sava, William Symes, Leon Thomsen, Alejandro Valenciano, and Ioan Vlad

Number 112, September 2002

outfile2

2002

Preface

The electronic version of this report[*] makes the included programs and applications available to the reader. The markings [ER], [CR], and [NR] are promises by the author about the reproducibility of each figure result. Reproducibility is a way of organizing computational research that allows both the author and the reader of a publication to verify the reported results. Reproducibility facilitates the transfer of knowledge within SEP and between SEP and its sponsors.

ER
denotes Easily Reproducible and are the results of processing described in the paper. The author claims that you can reproduce such a figure from the programs, parameters, and makefiles included in the electronic document. The data must either be included in the electronic distribution, be easily available to all researchers (e.g. SEG-EAGE data sets), or be available in the SEP data library[*]. We assume you have a UNIX workstation with Fortran, Fortran90, C, X-Windows system and the software downloadable from our website (SEP makerules, SEPlib, and the SEP latex package), or other free software such as SU. Before the publication of the electronic document, someone other than the author tests the author's claim by destroying and rebuilding all ER figures. Some ER figures may not be reproducible by outsiders because they depend on data sets that are too large to distribute, or data that we do not have permission to redistribute but are in the SEP data library.
CR
denotes Conditional Reproducibility. The author certifies that the commands are in place to reproduce the figure if certain resources are available. SEP staff have only attempted to make sure that the makefile rules exist and the source codes referenced are provided. The primary reasons for the CR designation is that the processing requires 20 minutes or more, or commercial packages such as Matlab or Mathematica.
${\rm \bf M}\;\;\;\;$
denotes a figure that may be viewed as a movie in the web version of the report. A movie may be either ER or CR.
NR
denotes Non-Reproducible figures. SEP discourages authors from flagging their figures as NR except for figures that are used solely for motivation, comparison, or illustration of the theory, such as: artist drawings, scannings, or figures taken from SEP reports not by the authors or from non-SEP publications.
Our testing is currently limited to LINUX 2.4 (using the Portland Group Fortran90 compiler), but the code should be portable to other architectures. Reader's suggestions are welcome. For more information on reproducing SEP's electronic documents, please visit
<http://sepwww.stanford.edu/research/redoc/>.

SEP-112 -- TABLE OF CONTENTS

Velocity

Ray based tomography using residual Stolt migration (ps.gz 10576K) (pdf 2660K) (src 46677K)
Clapp R. G.
In complex areas, residual vertical movement is not an effective method to calculate traveltime errors for image domain tomography. By scanning over velocity ratios using residual Stolt migration, a different criteria for a coherent image can be defined, and a traveltime error approximated. The resulting traveltime errors are more accurate, therefore the tomography procedure is more robust than the more traditional methodology. Results are shown on a complex 2-D dataset.
Wave-equation MVA applied to 4-D seismic monitoring (ps.gz 441K) (pdf 201K) (src 1270K)
Sava P., Etgen J., and Thomsen L.
4-D seismic processing is gradually maturing as a technique able to aid time lapse monitoring of seismic reservoirs Biondi et al. (1996); Lumley (1995). However, many limitations hamper the ability of 4-D seismic monitoring to produce reliable results in complicated reservoir situations. One such example is that of multi-layer reservoirs where changes at deeper levels are masked by those that occur at the top reservoir. In these cases, ...
Wave-equation MVA using diffracted data (ps.gz 7332K) (pdf 736K) (src 1575K)
Sava P. and Etgen J.
Migration velocity analysis (MVA) using diffracted data is not a new concept. Harlan (1986) addressed this problem and proposed a method to isolate diffraction events around faults. He also proposed a MVA technique applicable to simple geology, constant velocity or v(z), and quantifies the focusing quality using statistical tools. de Vries and Berkhout (1984) use the concept of minimum entropy to evaluate diffraction focusing, and apply this ...
A generalization of wave-equation migration velocity analysis (ps.gz 190K) (pdf 130K) (src 328K)
Sava P. and Symes W. W.
Wave-equation migration velocity analysis is derived from wavefield-continuation migration techniques. The velocity model is updated by optimizing certain properties of the migrated images. Different migration velocity analysis optimization criteria exist, of which two commonly used are fitting a target image and minimizing the differential semblance of migrated images. Both techniques are special cases of a general family of optimization functions. Fitting a target image is an attractive technique because we can guide the solution in the desired direction. However, we can only progress in small steps with the target image being kept within the Born approximation with respect to the reference image. Minimizing differential semblance is an attractive technique, too, because we are operating with small differences of nearby offsets which are likely within the Born approximation. However, this method is not directly guided toward the solution and aliasing or any remnants of coherent noise, like multiples or converted waves, can cause it to diverge.
Dealing with errors in automatic velocity analysis (ps.gz 6328K) (pdf 1179K) (src 23167K)
Clapp R. G.
The lack of human interaction in automatic reflection tomography leads to a larger percentage of ``bad'' data points. The number of data points associated with events with spurious moveouts (such as multiples and converted waves) can be minimized by intelligently controlling the semblance scanning range. The effect of the bad data points can be limited by replacing the standard L2 norm solution with a norm closer to L1 by reweighted least-squares. By replacing the standard constant $$ parameter with a diagonal operator, areas with large errors in moveout can be highly regularized with minimal effect on areas with more reliable moveout information. This methodology is applied to a complex 2-D dataset.
Velocity estimation for seismic data exhibiting focusing-effect AVO (part 2) (ps.gz 3347K) (pdf 1375K) (src 8201K)
Vlad I.
Vlad and Biondi (2002) have shown that focusing-effect AVO (FEAVO) exists and is visible in the angle domain. They have conjectured that wave-equation migration velocity analysis (WEMVA) might solve the FEAVO problem. I continue that line of work by showing evidence that WEMVA is the right tool, and by redoing the preprocessing and velocity analysis of the dataset on which FEAVO was defined.

Imaging

Transformation to dip-dependent Common Image Gathers (ps.gz 559K) (pdf 466K) (src 1713K)
Biondi B. and Symes W.
We introduce a new transform of offset-domain Common Image Gathers (CIGs) obtained by wavefield-continuation migration methods. This transformation can be applied to either horizontal-offset CIGs or vertical-offset CIGs. It overcomes the limitations that both kinds of CIGs suffer in the presence of a wide range of reflectors' dips. The result of our transformation is an image cube that is equivalent to the image cube that would have been computed if the offset direction were aligned along the apparent geological dip of each event. The proposed transformation applies a non-uniform dip-dependent stretching of the offset axis and can be efficiently performed in the Fourier domain. Because it is dependent on the image's apparent dip, the offset stretching automatically corrects for the image-point dispersal. Tests on a synthetic data set confirm the potential advantages of the transformation for migration velocity analysis of data containing steeply dipping reflectors.
Deconvolution imaging condition for reverse-time migration (ps.gz 637K) (pdf 473K) (src 14691K)
Valenciano A. A. and Biondi B.
The reverse-time migration imaging condition can be improved by computing the reflection strength at each subsurface point as the zero lag value of the deconvolution of the receiver wavefield by the source wavefield. I show that by using this approach it is possible to eliminate image artifacts due to wavefield multipathing through velocity anomalies. I also show that it has the advantage of handling better amplitudes during imaging.
Multicomponent data regularization (ps.gz 2954K) (pdf 2006K) (src 19689K)
Rosales D. and Biondi B.
Geometry regularization is a key process for obtaining reliable subsurface images with 3D seismic data. 3D regularization is, so far, a technique mainly used on PP land data. Multicomponent ocean bottom cable (OBC) technology simulates 3D land acquisition for multicomponent geophones at the ocean bottom. Reliable subsurface PS images, which provide amplitude information, have to go through a regularization process. Converted wave Azimuth Moveout (PSAMO) acts as a regularization operator in the formulation of the geometry regularization process in the least-squares sense.
Equivalence of source-receiver migration and shot-profile migration (ps.gz 4851K) (pdf 607K) (src 1321K)
Biondi B.
I first review the basic principles of shot-profile migration and source-receiver migration. Then I will show their equivalence.