Next: Linearized downward continuation preserves
Up: Evidence that the proposed
Previous: Deep-origin FEAVO effects
Extracting
the FEAVO anomalies assumes that the long spatial wavelength velocity
model is good enough that the reflectors are flat in angle gathers, and
only the amplitudes remain to be fixed.
Since the FEAVO effects are expressed both in the midpoint-angle
domain and in the angle-domain common image gathers, their separation
must
proceed in a synergistic fashion.
This involves the entire data volume.
For the simplest case (constant velocity, flat reflectors), the
FEAVO effects generated by a velocity anomaly at depth za and
midpoint ma will be distributed in the
depth(z)-midpoint(m)-angle() space along a surface
described by:
| |
(50) |
The derivation is laid out in Appendix B, and the shape of the
surface is shown in Figure .
ang3d_20_500_pi4
Figure 3 Shape of the FEAVO
``footprint'' in the depth-midpoint-angle space due to a velocity
anomaly 20 m deep in an otherwise constant velocity medium with flat
reflectors. For a better 3D visual understanding, the shape resembles
the bow of a flipped boat.
|
| |
Even for a v(z) case (Grand Isle dataset),
the shape of the anomaly will not be very different, especially for a
limited angle range (due to a finite range of offsets).
Figure shows the dips of the FEAVO effects
are confined to a limited range.
ang20_100_pi4
Figure 4 Midpoint-angle
contour map of FEAVO effects generated by a velocity anomaly 20m deep.
The angle range is wide (up to ),
which is wider than the range recorded in most of the real data sets.
Therefore, it is unlikely
that curvature of the anomalies be observed in real data panels.
|
| |
Therefore, as a first measure for separating them, we can apply an
appropriate f-k dip filter to the midpoint-angle slices
(Figure ).
This eliminates the largest part of the petrophysical
AVO. There is, however, no guarantee that the remaining energy within
the plausible FEAVO dip range does actually belong to FEAVO.
I will have to separate the signal from noise in the manner of
():
- 1.
- For each
point in the depth-midpoint section, consider that it ``houses'' an
anomaly and precompute the FEAVO-effect surface that depends on the
known long spatial wavelength velocity field.
- 2.
- Sum (or compute a semblance-like operator) along
the precomputed surfaces to obtain a depth-midpoint ``anomaly
map,'' taking care to distinguish between FEAVO caused
by absorption and that caused by velocity.
- 3.
- Filter the image based on its statistical properties, so
only the most focused points remain.
- 4.
- Spread the filtered image
along the precomputed surfaces back into the depth-midpoint-angle
space. Alternately, focusing could be done using the downward
continuation operator itself.
Next: Linearized downward continuation preserves
Up: Evidence that the proposed
Previous: Deep-origin FEAVO effects
Stanford Exploration Project
11/11/2002