next up previous print clean
Next: Conclusions Up: R. Clapp: STANFORD EXPLORATION Previous: Methodology

Example

We illustrate this diffraction focusing technique with a synthetic model simulating the diffracting points at the top of a rough salt body. The model is depicted in Figure [*]: the reflectivity at the top, and the reference slowness in the middle. The model consists of several diffractions, and the reference slowness is smoothly spatially varying.

Figure [*] shows at the bottom the image perturbation $\Delta \r$ caused by the ideal slowness perturbation $\Delta {\bf S}$ shown in the top panel in Figure [*]. $\Delta \r$ is created by subtracting the reference image from the perfectly focused one $\Delta \r=\r-\r_0$.

We take the image perturbation shown in the bottom panel of Figure [*] and compute the corresponding slowness perturbation using Equation ([*]). Figure [*] shows in the middle the result we obtain by applying the adjoint of the operator ${\bf L}$ to the image perturbation in Figure [*], and at the bottom the result of applying the least-squares inverse of ${\bf L}$ to the same $\Delta \r$.

Despite the inherent vertical smearing caused by the limited angular coverage, the slowness perturbations are nicely focused at their correct locations. Obviously, the result obtained with the least-squares inverse is much better focused than the one obtained by the simple adjoint operator, although we have only used the zero-offset and not the entire prestack data. The simple backprojection (top panel in Figure [*]) creates ``fat rays,'' also discussed by () and ().


next up previous print clean
Next: Conclusions Up: R. Clapp: STANFORD EXPLORATION Previous: Methodology
Stanford Exploration Project
11/11/2002