The previous paragraph underscores the main obstacle facing algorithms which attempt to jointly image multiples and primaries: while multiples provide additional information about the earth's reflectivity, we cannot exploit it unless we separate the individual modes. Cleanly separating a variety of different multiple modes from prestack data is both expensive and difficult. Moreover, by casting mode separation as a preprocessing step, as is the norm, we risk biasing the amplitudes in the separated modes, which could inhibit the integration.
LSJIMP solves the separation and integration problems simultaneously, as a global least-squares inversion problem. The model space, as illustrated in Figure , contains a collection of images, with the energy from each mode partitioned into one, and only one image. Moreover, each image has a special form: because the forward modeling operator contains appropriate amplitude correction operators the signal events in multiple and primary images are directly comparable, in terms of both kinematics and amplitudes. In order to solve the integration problem, we can apply a model regularization operator which penalizes inconsistency between images, and thus ``spreads'' signal from one model panel to another, using the multiples to fill gaps in the primary illumination and to increase signal fidelity.
LSJIMP models the recorded data as the superposition of primary reflections and p orders of pegleg multiples from multiple-generating surfaces. An order pegleg splits into i+1 legs. If we denote the primaries as and the leg of the order pegleg from the multiple generator as , the modeled data takes the following form:
(1) |
Other authors have solved a similar least-squares problem. Nemeth et al. (1999) jointly imaged and separated compressional waves and various (non-multiple) embedded coherent noise modes. Guitton et al. (2001) used nonstationary prediction-error filters to model primaries and surface-related multiples, but cast the problem purely in terms of wavefield separation, rather than joint imaging of multiples and primaries.
If we have designed an imaging operator that produces primary and multiple images with consistent signal (kinematics and angle-dependent amplitudes), then we assume that we can model the important events in the data. Let us denote the modeling operator (adjoint to imaging) for primaries and the image of the primaries . Similarly, for the leg of the order pegleg from the multiple generator, we denote the modeling operator and image and , respectively. Following Figure , we can rewrite equation ():
(2) | ||
(3) |