Just as the inverse filtering expressions
in frequency in
are converted to simple scalar systems,
the expressions for the signal and noise are appealing when
expressed in the frequency or in the frequency-wavenumber domains.
The expressions for noise can be considered
scalar expressions at a constant frequency in one dimension,
and at a constant frequency and a constant wavenumber
in two-dimensions.
For example, in one dimension, equation (
) becomes
| |
(55) |
) can be recognized as an optimal or
Wiener filterPress et al. (1986).
In the frequency-wavenumber, or
-k, domain, the same
idea applies,
except that each value of
is evaluated for points
in the
-k plane instead of at points of constant frequency.
The
in equation (
) becomes
, and
the expressions are separated into samples of constant wavenumber (k)
and constant
frequency (
).
This can be extended into more dimensions by specifying k1, k2, etc.,
for all the spatial directions considered.
The inversion to separate signal and noise may then be thought of
as decomposing the data into frequency and dip components,
then distributing these components between the signal and noise
as determined by the frequency and dip
components of
and
.The advantage of having more dimensions is that the noise and signal
may be better distinguished as they are spread over
, k1,
k2, and so on.
Even if some overlap in the characterization of noise and signal remains,
the overlap should tend to decrease as the number of dimensions increase.
Although viewing the separation of signal and noise in the frequency domains may be enlightening, for the work done in this thesis the inversions will generally be done in the time and space domain which provides the advantages of simplicity of coding, control of the filter shape, and easy windowing of data to account for non-stationarity.