Next: Consistency of the Data
Up: methodology
Previous: AVO of Multiple Reflections
Applied to a common-midpoint gather, equation (1) produces an approximate unstacked
zero-offset image of pseudo-primaries from water bottom multiple reflections.
In this section, I introduce a least squares scheme to compute self-consistent images of
primaries and pseudo-primaries which are in turn consistent with the data. First I define
some terms:
With these definitions in hand, we can now write the forward modeling operator for joint
NMO of primaries and multiples of order 1 to p.
| ![\begin{displaymath}
\left[ \bold N_0 \ \ \bold N_1 \bold R_1 \ \cdots \ \bold N_...
...old m_1 \\ \vdots \\ \bold m_p
\end{array} \right] = \bf Lm\end{displaymath}](img16.gif) |
(6) |
In words, equation (6) takes a collection of psuedo-primary panels, divides
each by the appropriate reflection coefficient, applies inverse (adjoint) NMO to each, and
then sums them together to create something that should resemble ``data''.
We define the data residual as the difference between the input data and the
forward-modeled data:
| ![\begin{displaymath}
\bold r_d = \bf d - Lm\end{displaymath}](img17.gif) |
(7) |
Viewed as a standard least-squares inversion problem, minimization of L2 norm of the
data residual by solution of the normal equations is underdetermined. Additional regularization
terms, defined in later sections, force the problem to be overdetermined.
Next: Consistency of the Data
Up: methodology
Previous: AVO of Multiple Reflections
Stanford Exploration Project
6/10/2002