Next: Discussion
Up: Results
Previous: Devil's Advocate: What do
I test the proposed algorithm on a single CMP gather from the Mobil AVO dataset, described
above. The results are shown in Figure 7. Relative to the results
seen on the Haskell synthetic, they are fairly poor. On the bright side, notice decent preservation
of signal amplitude. The earliest water-bottom multiples are suppressed quite effectively, although
the later reverberations are left almost untouched.
The reasons for the less-than-perfect are likely numerous. First, and most important, the multiple
reflections quickly become incoherent with an increasing number of bounces. They match well with the
primaries only for the strongest reflections. I estimated a relatively small water-bottom reflection
coefficient, 0.1, so the multiples are relatively weak in amplitude. I did not perform any preprocessing
on the data, and I believe they were donated to SEP as raw gathers. Berlioux and Lumley (1994)
applied cable balancing to the Mobil AVO dataset. High-wavenumber, offset-variant amplitude variations
along events spoil the ability regularization equation (8) to discriminate against
crosstalk.
cmps.lsrow.haskreal
Figure 7
Application of equation (10) to CMP from Mobil AVO data.
Top row, left to right: Raw CMP gather, NMO applied; Estimated primary panel; difference panel.
Next: Discussion
Up: Results
Previous: Devil's Advocate: What do
Stanford Exploration Project
6/10/2002