Next: Noise removal on Shearer's
Up: SIGNAL-NOISE DECOMPOSITION BY DIP
Previous: Signal/noise decomposition examples
Since signal and noise are uncorrelated,
the spectrum of data is the spectrum of the signal plus that of the noise.
An equation for this idea is
| ![\begin{displaymath}
\sigma_d^2 \eq
\sigma_s^2 \ + \
\sigma_n^2\end{displaymath}](img41.gif) |
(15) |
This says resonances in the signal
and resonances in the noise
will both be found in the data.
When we are given
and
it seems a simple
matter to subtract to get
.Actually it can be very tricky.
We are never given
and
;we must estimate them.
Further, they can be a function of frequency, wave number, or dip,
and these can be changing during measurements.
We could easily find ourselves with a negative estimate for
which would ruin any attempt to segregate signal from noise.
An idea of Simon Spitz can help here.
Let us reexpress equation (15) with prediction-error filters.
| ![\begin{displaymath}
{1\over \bar A_d A_d} \eq
{1\over \bar A_s A_s} \ + \
{1\ov...
...\ {\bar A_n A_n}
\over
( {\bar A_s A_s} ) ( {\bar A_n A_n})
}\end{displaymath}](img45.gif) |
(16) |
Inverting
| ![\begin{displaymath}
{ \bar A_d A_d} \eq
{
( {\bar A_s A_s} ) \ ( {\bar A_n A_n})
\over
{\bar A_s A_s} \ +\ {\bar A_n A_n}
}\end{displaymath}](img46.gif) |
(17) |
The essential feature of a PEF is its zeros.
Where a PEF approaches zero, its inverse is large and resonating.
When we are concerned with the zeros of a mathematical function
we tend to focus on numerators and ignore denominators.
The zeros in
compound with the zeros in
to make the zeros in
.This motivates the ``Spitz Approximation.''
| ![\begin{displaymath}
{ \bar A_d A_d} \eq
( {\bar A_s A_s} )\ ( {\bar A_n A_n})\end{displaymath}](img50.gif) |
(18) |
It usually happens that we can
find a patch of data where no signal is present.
That's a good place to estimate the noise PEF An.
It is usually much harder to find a patch of data where no noise is present.
This motivates the Spitz approximation which by saying
Ad = As An
tells us that the hard-to-estimate As is the ratio
As = Ad / An
of two easy-to-estimate PEFs.
It would be computationally convenient if
we had As expressed not as a ratio.
For this, form the signal
by applying the noise PEF An to the data
.The spectral relation is
| ![\begin{displaymath}
\sigma_u^2 \eq
\sigma_d^2 /
\sigma_n^2\end{displaymath}](img52.gif) |
(19) |
Inverting this expression
and using the Spitz approximation
we see that
a PEF estimate on
is the required As in numerator form because
| ![\begin{displaymath}
A_u \eq A_d / A_n \eq A_s\end{displaymath}](img54.gif) |
(20) |
Next: Noise removal on Shearer's
Up: SIGNAL-NOISE DECOMPOSITION BY DIP
Previous: Signal/noise decomposition examples
Stanford Exploration Project
4/27/2004