Next: Explicit heat-flow equation
Up: FINITE DIFFERENCING IN (omega,x)-SPACE
Previous: First derivatives, explicit method
Let us solve the equation
| |
(19) |
by numerical methods.
The most obvious (but not the only) approach is the basic definition of
elementary calculus.
For the time derivative, this is
| |
(20) |
Using this in equation (19) yields the
the inflation-of-money equations (17) and (18),
where .Thus in the inflation-of-money equation
the expression of dq/dt is centered at ,whereas the expression of q by itself is at time t.
There is no reason the q on the right side of equation (19)
cannot be averaged at time t
with time ,thus centering the
whole equation at .When writing difference equations,
it is customary to write more simply as qt+1.
(Formally one should say and write qn+1 instead of
qt+1, but helpful mnemonic information is carried by using
t as the subscript instead of some integer like n.)
Thus, a centered approximation of (19) is
| |
(21) |
Letting , this becomes
| |
(22) |
which is representable as the difference star
For a fixed this star gives
a more accurate solution to the differential
equation (19) than does the star for the inflation of money.
The reasons for the names ``explicit method'' and ``implicit method''
above will become clear only after we study a more complicated
equation such as the heat-flow equation.
Next: Explicit heat-flow equation
Up: FINITE DIFFERENCING IN (omega,x)-SPACE
Previous: First derivatives, explicit method
Stanford Exploration Project
12/26/2000