Conducting School Prayer Forums
- During the fall legislative period, Congress will likely begin consideration of proposals to
amend the freedom of religion and religion establishment clauses of the First Amendment.
Congressman Istook verified in his opening statement at the Oklahoma City school prayer
field hearing held earlier this month that the proponents of the amendment will formally
introduce their proposals in September and that the Republican House leadership will work
towards bringing it before the full House before January. The Senate's time line is more
difficult to predict, though we should be prepared for them to deal with this issue at roughly
the same time as does the House.
- Those in favor of altering the First Amendment's religion clauses may choose to do so
through legislative statutes, rather than through a constitutional amendment. Which approach
they take will depend on the level of support within their ranks for changing the First
Amendment. Since the statute requires neither ratification by 3/5s of the state legislatures,
nor a supra-majority within Congress, supporters may find this statutory vehicle more
appealing than the amendment. Regardless of which form the proposal takes, all indications
are that the amendment supporters will go forward with it soon and push hard for a vote on
the House and Senate floors.
- In light of the severity and imminence of this threat to all of our religious liberties, it is
imperative that the faith community convey to Congress its strong opposition to any changes
in the religion clauses. Local Interfaith Alliance-sponsored events designed to inform the
public on this issue offer a great opportunity to raise consciousness among our communities
of faith. These more cognizant and energized constituents should, in turn, express their
reservations about these proposed changes to Congress. Therefore, through the process of
these forums, we can educate the public and contribute to the defeat of any legislation that
will undoubtedly restrict our religious liberties.
- In the following pages, we have provided you with a model for planning and conducting a
school prayer forum. We hope that you will think seriously about hosting a school prayer
forum that closely resembles this model. Keep in mind that you will maximize the impact of
your forum on the legislative process if you schedule it before the end of October. Develop
Time Line
- As you probably are well aware, developing a timeline for planning this event is the first step
to creating your forum. There is obviously no time line that applies to all forums, but some
guidelines are useful to remember. The time line should be comprehensive, realistic, and
allow for changes and modifications as the planning process evolves. Selection Process
Panel Composition
- To the extent that is possible in your community, you should seek out panelists from some
of the groups most involved and familiar with this issue. It is your discretion to determine
whether your panel should include proponents of school prayer.
- Your panel should include a member of the clergy opposed to school prayer. (Again,
you should use your judgment in deciding if the panel will also include clergy or lay
representation from the advocates of school prayer).
- Because of the amendment's implications for public education, you should reserve a
third slot for a school board member or administrator.
- Since the amendment presupposes that the First Amendment is inadequate and
therefore should be modified, a constitutional scholar should have the fourth spot.
- The fifth slot should go to a leader in the Parent Teachers Association (PTA) or
some similar organization. If no such organization exists or possesses adequate
influence in your community, you can substitute an informed parent.
- The success of the forum will depend on whether you identify quality and articulate panelists
who are familiar with this issue. In addition, precluding board members or officers from
serving as either a panelist or the moderator will help ensure the propriety or fairness of the
event. Selection Criteria
- In order to ensure identification of the most effective panelists, it might be helpful to put
together selection criteria for evaluating prospective candidates. Your list should include
these criteria and guidelines:
- knowledge about separation of church & state
- high comfort level with public speaking
- articulate
- civil and cordial communicator
- demonstrated leadership within religious, legal, or educational communities
- ensure that the Christian panelists are not monolithic with respect to school prayer.
You should have at least one Christian lay or clergy representative opposed to the
proposed legislation so as not to reinforce misimpression that Christian community
unified in support of it.
- be prepared for radical religious right groups to try to disrupt or take control of the
forum. As the Florida and Virginia Congressional field hearings illustrate, these
members' vocal and demonstrative presence could potentially transform your forum
into a shouting match or rally for their side. Although you cannot prohibit these
strident people from attending your forum, a substantial crowd of amendment
opponents, calm panelists, and a strong moderator can mitigate this situation and
preserve the educational quality of the forum.
- In assessing whether candidates meet your criteria, you should take advantage of your
congregants' and others' extensive knowledge of individuals from these five groups. They
can help you identify quality candidates and inform your evaluation of them without your
having to interview candidates. Selection of Moderator
- The final component of this selection process is identifying a capable and neutral moderator.
Again, as with panel selection, you should compile a list of likely candidates and create
selection criteria with which to evaluate them. The most important of these criteria are
perceived neutrality, knowledge of the issue, and possession of strong communication skills.
The religion editor from a large daily newspaper or a similar representative from a local TV
network affiliate are two examples of possible moderators. Agenda & Format of Forum
- Once you have identified the groups represented on the panel, it is important to design the
format for your session. We suggest that you divide it into three sections, which, for
explanatory purposes, we will refer to as the introductory, structured question and answer,
and audience-initiated question sections. Introductory Session (30 Minutes)
- As the name implies, the introductory segment will simply permit each of the five panelists to
introduce him or herself and his or her view on the issue. In order to preserve more time for
the other segments, you should grant each of them five minutes for this segment. Since their
statements will be largely unstructured, if it is appropriate, they can at the outset mention
briefly what belief system (or faith) informs their position. Previously Determined Q & A (1
Hour)
- As we envision this segment, the moderator would pose a separate set of questions to each
panelist. Unlike more general questions, these questions would concentrate on each
panelist's particular perspective on and experience with the separation of church and state
issue. In the interest of maintaining fairness and keeping this section from exceeding its one
hour time limit, we suggest that you ask each participant approximately three questions to
which each panelist would respond in 3-5 minutes per question.
- We have formulated the following questions and organized them by profession or group:
Clergy
- How does your faith inform your position on this issue?
- How would school prayer affect the faith and religion of students in your
congregation?
- Evaluate schools role in determining acceptable prayer or worship practice in the
event the amendment or similar legislation is enacted? Does it conflict with or
complement your responsibilities as the spiritual leader of your congregation?
- What is the historical position of your religion or denomination regarding this
particular issue? Does this differ with their current position?
School Officials
- Have you witnessed, or are you directly familiar with, controversial incidents or
situations at your school concerning prayer or religious expression? If so, how were
they resolved and do you agree with the resolution processes?
- Evaluate teachers' and parents' understanding or knowledge of what is acceptable
and unacceptable religious expression.
- Do you think it is possible to have group prayers that do not discriminate against
others in your classrooms?
Constitutional Scholars Please outline the parameters of constitutionally protected religious
expression in public places, concentrating on public schools? What is your opinion on
proposed amendments? Do you think it necessary or worthwhile to amend the clauses in
the ways proposed? Is there a consensus among legal scholars on this issue? If not, how
would you explain this division? Parental Groups
- Does the amendment enhance or impair your capacity to influence your children's
religious development?
- Evaluate how well informed parents are on acceptable/unacceptable forms of
religious expression.
- Have your children or the children of others affiliated with your group been subjected
to religious persecution by either someone attempting to overreach the boundaries set
by the
- Court or by a school official illegally restricting one's well-established right to practice
his/her religion while in school?
Audience Q & A (30 Minutes)
- In the final thirty minutes of the forum, you should randomly solicit as many questions as
time will permit the panelists to answer. These can either be directed to all the participants
or to particular panelists. Location/Time of Event
- As you consider a site, you should keep in mind the need for appearance of neutrality and
that you want to bear little cost in converting the room to a forum site. Ideal locations are
public halls or places that are already equipped for relatively large groups and have quality
sound systems. However, you should be careful not to reserve a space whose size might
create the appearance of a low turnout regardless of the actual number present. Although it
may seem counter-intuitive, we recommend that you reserve a room that is too small rather
than too large.
- As for the time and date, the primary considerations are that it be held before the end of
October and not conflict with the Jewish High Holidays or the Sabbath. These religious
considerations, combined with most people's work schedules, suggest that you would
attract the most participants during the evening. If you select the evening period over
lunchtime, you should start the forum by 6:30 P.M. so that it concludes before 9:00, which
might still enable the newspapers and TV stations to cover the event while its still
newsworthy. Publicizing the Forum
- As soon as you have selected a date and reserved space for your event, you should move
quickly to provide the press, and by extension the public, with all its details. Since
notification and coverage from local newspapers, radio stations, and TV stations is critical
to the event's success, we have created a model press advisory and press release for you to
adapt and send out to local and statewide media. As you might expect, while you should
notify weekly newspapers as soon as you have confirmed the event's details, you should
wait and send the press advisory to TV stations, daily newspapers, and radio stations no
sooner than ten days prior to your forum. As for the press release, you should send it out
either in the afternoon (if the event is during lunch) or early the next morning (if the event is
held at night). Obviously, you will need to modify our suggested press release so that it
describes and is compatible with your forum.
- To the extent possible and appropriate, you should notify your congregation through
church/temple bulletin inserts, bulletin boards, and other available internal communication
outlets. As you know, members of this group will likely be among the most receptive to
attending the forum, so it is imperative that you make them aware of it. Sample Press
Advisory Media Advisory [DATE of ADVISORY] School Prayer Forum [NAME of
INTERFAITH ALLIANCE] For More Information Contact: [EVENT
COORDINATOR'S NAME] [PHONE NUMBER]
- [NAME of ALLIANCE] is sponsoring a forum to discuss possible amendments to the First
Amendment religion clauses currently being considered by Congress [DATE/TIME of
EVENT] at [EVENT LOCATION]. The forum's panel will include prominent individuals
from the religious, legal, and educational communities as well as other interested citizens.
[INSERT SPECIFIC NAMES AND BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION] The panel
will reflect the positions of both those advocating changes in the clauses and those
expressing serious concerns about the implications these changes will have for all of our
religious liberties. The forum is open to the general public and [NAME of ALLIANCE]
encourages those from all religious traditions to participate in this public discussion on
[DATE of EVENT]. Through this engaged and civil dialogue between the panelists, the
forum should raise public awareness on this issue as Congress begins to consider possible
constitutional amendments and illustrate the positive effect that constructive and civil debate
can have on public debate in America. Sample Press Release Press Release [DATE of
RELEASE] School Prayer Forum [NAME of INTERFAITH ALLIANCE] For More
Information Contact: [EVENT COORDINATOR'S NAME] [PHONE NUMBER]
- [TODAY/LAST NIGHT] [NAME OF ALLIANCE] sponsored a community discussion
on the need for changes in the religion clauses of the First Amendment. [INSERT NAMES
& PARTICIPANT INFORMATION] shared their views on this matter and fielded
questions from the audience of [APPROXIMATE NUMBER IN ATTENDANCE]
Although [INSERT NAMES] argued that the proposed legislation was necessary, the
majority of the panel of legal, educational, and religious leaders, including [INSERT
NAME], recognized the potential problems with permitting compulsory student or
teacher-led prayer or worship in public schools. [INSERT RELEVANT TESTIMONY]
Several panelists advocated a massive campaign to educate parents and school officials on
the constitutionally-protected parameters of acceptable religious expression in the schools
as an alternative to the radical step of amending the First Amendment. While the former will
protect our children from unnecessary religious coercion, the latter would undoubtedly
restrict their freedom not to participate in religious practices against their will while in
school.* * Please contact the national office for help with your press release.
|