Next: General approach to waveform
Up: Review of Frequency-domain waveform
Previous: Conjugate Gradient Definition
After computing the (conjugate) gradient vector, one must calculate the step length,
, used to update model parameters (equation 5). This computation is not straightforward because the acoustic wave equation is non-linear in model parameters
and the Frechét derivatives are never explicitly calculated. One approach is to use a linear approximation technique based on perturbation methods Mora (1987). This involves calculating an approximate Frechét derivative,
, by performing an additional forward modeling using a set of model parameters perturbed by a scaled version of the computed conjugate gradient (i.e.
) and comparing the result with the initial forward modeled data. This is summarized notationally as
| ![\begin{displaymath}
\hat{F}_n = {\bf L}(m_n+\eta c_n) - {\bf L}(m_n)= \Psi_{pert}-\Psi_{orig},\end{displaymath}](img39.gif) |
(12) |
where
and
are the perturbed and original wavefields, respectively. Perturbation scaling factor
is constrained to be within
of the current model parameter values. The step-length is then given by Mora (1987)
| ![\begin{displaymath}
\gamma_n = \frac{c^{*}_n g_n}{ \frac{1}{\eta^2} \hat{F}^{*}_n \hat{F}_n + c^{*}_n c_n}.\end{displaymath}](img44.gif) |
(13) |
Again, the step-length in equation 13 is equal to that in Mora (1987) where covariance matrices are represented by identity operators.
Next: General approach to waveform
Up: Review of Frequency-domain waveform
Previous: Conjugate Gradient Definition
Stanford Exploration Project
1/16/2007