Next: Example 2 - Polar
Up: Shragge: GRWE
Previous: Split-Step Fourier Approximation
An instructive example is a coordinate system formed by a shearing
action on a Cartesian mesh (see figure ). A sheared
Cartesian coordinate system is defined by,
| |
(21) |
where is the shear angle of the coordinate system
( is Cartesian).
2Dexamp
Figure 1 2-D sheared Cartesian
coordinates. Left panel: Physical domain represented by sheared
Cartesian coordinates defined by ; Right panel:
GRWE domain chosen to be the unit square . |
| |
This system reduces to a more workable set of two equations,
| |
(22) |
that has a metric tensor gij given by,
| |
(23) |
with a determinant and an associated
metric tensor gij given by,
| |
(24) |
Note that because the tensor in equation 24 is
coordinate invariant, equation 10 simplifies to,
| |
(25) |
and generates the following dispersion relation,
| |
(26) |
Expanding out these terms leads to an expression for wavenumber ,
| |
(27) |
Substituting the values of the associated metric tensor in
equation 24 into equation 27 yields,
| |
(28) |
A numerical test using a Cartesian coordinate system sheared at
25 from vertical is shown in figure .
The background velocity model is 1500 ms-1 and the zero-offset
data consist of 4 flat plane-waves t=0.2, 0.4, 0.6 and 0.8 s.
As expected, the zero-offset migration results image reflectors at
depths z=300, 600, 900, and 1200 m. Note that the propagation has
created boundary artifacts: those on the left are reflections due to a
truncated coordinate system while those on the right are hyperbolic
diffractions caused by truncated plane-waves.
Rays0
Figure 2 Sheared Cartesian coordinate
system test. Coordinate system shear angle and velocity are
and 1500 ms-1, respectively. Zero-offset
data consist of 4 flat plane-wave impulses at t=0.2, 0.4, 0.6 and
0.8 s that are correctly imaged at depths z=300, 600, 900, and
1200 m.
|
| |
Next: Example 2 - Polar
Up: Shragge: GRWE
Previous: Split-Step Fourier Approximation
Stanford Exploration Project
4/5/2006