Figure 1 illustrates the generalization of the migration operator from a Kirchhoff viewpoint. Simple geometric relations allow us to derive the kinematics of the generalized migration operator. If we migrate an impulse recorded at time tD, midpoint mD and surface offset hD, the migration impulse response can be expressed as follows:
![]() |
(1) | |
(2) | ||
(3) |
![]() |
(4) |
imp-resp
Figure 1 Geometry used for evaluating the impulse response of integral migration, generalized to produce a prestack image function of the subsurface offset ![]() | ![]() |
The expression for the generalized impulse response of prestack
anisotropic migration leads to the analytical evaluation of the
offset dip () and
midpoint dip (
) along
the planes tangent to the impulse response. When we adopt the Kirchhoff
viewpoint, the group aperture angles can then be related to the
offset dips in the image, and the group dip angles can be
similarly related to the midpoint dips in the image.