next up previous print clean
Next: RMO velocity analysis Up: Measuring Previous: Measuring

Event picking

The domain for picking plays a major role in deciding the type of tomography algorithm. Different algorithms use different domains for picking, such as the time or the depth in prestack or poststack, respectively. Among these picking algorithms, I chose the algorithm that picks events in the stacked image after prestack migration, which requires a minimum number of picks and provides reflector information. The advantage of having reflector information in the method based on event picking in the depth domain is achieved by prestack migration. For this research, I used planewave synthesis imaging that synthesizes planewaves at the surface.

As an example, I have generated a synthetic data set with finite-difference acoustic modeling. Figure [*] shows the interval velocity model used to generate the synthetic data. To avoid surface-related multiples, an absorbing boundary is applied at the surface. The near-offset section of the synthetic prestack data set, Figure [*], shows that the surface-related multiples have not been generated.

As an initial guess for the velocity of the medium, a two-layer model, shown in Figure [*], is used, with water velocity for the top layer, because we can easily estimate the depth of the water bottom from the seismic data even in a real case.

In order to obtain a reference image to pick dominant reflectors, I apply surface-oriented planewave synthesis imaging. I synthesized thirty-one different incidence angles at the surface; the stacked image of them all is shown in Figure [*]. Figure [*] shows the locations of the reflectors picked, with reflector numbers assigned along them.

 
synvel
synvel
Figure 1
Velocity model used to generate a synthetic data set with finite-difference acoustic modeling.
view burn build edit restore

 
syn-near
syn-near
Figure 2
Near-offset section modeled using the finite-difference method.
view burn build edit restore

 
synvel-iter0
synvel-iter0
Figure 3
Velocity model used as an initial guess. The top layer has a water velocity of 1500 m/s with the same thickness as that of the true model, and the lower layer has a velocity of 2.5 km/s.
view burn build edit restore

 
pws-syn-iter0
pws-syn-iter0
Figure 4
Stacked image after planewave synthesis imaging that synthesized thirty-one different incidence angles, from -30 to +30 degrees, at the surface.
view burn build edit restore

 
pick0
pick0
Figure 5
The picked reflectors. The numbers along each reflector represent the reflector number assigned.
view burn build edit restore


next up previous print clean
Next: RMO velocity analysis Up: Measuring Previous: Measuring
Stanford Exploration Project
2/5/2001