|
|
|
| Dix inversion constrained by L1-norm optimization | |
|
Next: Dix inversion by IRLS
Up: Li and Maysami: L1
Previous: Introduction
The linear relationship between the RMS
velocity and the square of the interval velocity is given by Dix
Equation:
|
(1) |
where is the interval velocity, is the stacking velocity or
RMS velocity, and is the sample number. Both velocities run down
the traveltime depth axis. If we define
and
, we can set up the Dix inversion problem in an sense
as follows:
|
(2) |
where u is the unknown model we are inverting for, d
is the known data from velocity scan, C is the causal
integration operator, is a data residual weighting
function, which is proportional to our confidence in the RMS velocity.
Fitting goal (2) itself cannot fully constrain the inversion
problem, because the integration operator has a large null space at
high frequencies. Therefore, Clapp et
al. (1998) supplement this system with a regularization term to take
the advantage of the prior geological
information, of which smoothness and blockiness are two typical
examples. For the case we are interested in, we use blockiness as
regularization. In a mathematical form, it can be written as follows:
|
(3) |
where
is the vertical derivative of the velocity model and
is the weight controlling the strength of the regularization.
|
|
|
| Dix inversion constrained by L1-norm optimization | |
|
Next: Dix inversion by IRLS
Up: Li and Maysami: L1
Previous: Introduction
2009-10-19