|
|
|
| Dix inversion constrained by L1-norm optimization | |
|
Next: Dix inversion as an
Up: Li and Maysami: L1
Previous: Li and Maysami: L1
Dix formula (Dix, 1952) estimates interval velocities from picked
stacking velocities. The conventional result of constrained least-squares Dix
inversion (Harlan, 1999; Clapp, 2001; Koren and Ravve, 2006) is
always a smooth velocity model, because the regularization is imposed
in the sense. However, to represent a
geological environment with sharp velocity contrasts, e.g., carbonate
layers, salt bodies and strong faulting, we may need a blocky
velocity model rather than a smooth velocity model. Valenciano et al. (2003)
proposed to use edge-preserving regularization with Dix inversion in
order to get sharp edges in interval velocity. However, one of the
solvers they used, IRLS (Iterative Re-weighted Least
Squares) is cumbersome to use because users must specify numerical
parameters with unclear physical meaning.
-norm optimization is known to be a robust estimator to yield sparse
models. Many works (Guitton, 2005; Claerbout and Muir, 1973; Darche, 1989; Nichols, 1994) has shown that -norm is not
sensitive to outliers, while it penalizes the small residuals down
to zero. In theory, when the model space is sparse and the data are
noisy, regressions
produced by optimization always outperform those produced by
norms.
In this study, we analyze, improve and test different methods on a
simple synthetic
problem as well as a field-data problem. We aim to develop
robust and efficient solvers to perform regressions of an
nature. We initially improve the traditional IRLS method,
explore the conjugate direction method, and
finally test an hybrid method. The inversion results of a
1-D, synthetic, 2-step, interval-velocity model and a 1-D field data
example are given at the end of the paper.
|
|
|
| Dix inversion constrained by L1-norm optimization | |
|
Next: Dix inversion as an
Up: Li and Maysami: L1
Previous: Li and Maysami: L1
2009-10-19