The data modeling process for three seismic datasets over an evolving earth model can be written as
(A-18)
where
,
and
are respectively datasets for the baseline, first and second monitor,
is the baseline reflectivity and the time-lapse reflectivities
and
are defined as
(A-19)
where
and
are respectively the monitor reflectivities at the times data
and
were acquired (with survey geometries defined by the linear
and
).
The least-squares solution to equation A-18 is given as
(A-20)
where the symbol denotes transpose complex conjugate.
We rewrite equation A-20 as
(A-21)
where
is the migrated image from the
survey, and is the corresponding Hessian matrix.
Introducing spatial and temporal regularization goals that incorporates prior knowledge of the reservoir geometry and location as well as constraints on the inverted time-lapse images into equation A-21 we obtain
(A-22)
where,
(A-23)
with being the spatial regularization terms for the baseline and time-lapse images respectively while
is the temporal regularization between the surveys.
Note that
and
are not explicitly computed, but instead, the regularization operators and
(and their adjoints) are applied at each step of the inversion.
Parameters
and determine the relative strengths of the spatial and temporal regularization respectively.
Equation A-22 can be generalized to an arbitrary number of surveys as follows
(A-24)
where, is the Hessian operator, defined as
(A-25)
The regularization operators and
are defined as
(A-26)
where,
(A-27)
and,
(A-28)
The input vector into the RJID formulation,
is given as
(A-29)
while the inversion targets are
(A-30)
The temporal constraint on the baseline image,
may be set to zero, since it is assumed that the original geological structure is unchanged over time or that geomechanical changes are accounted for before/during inversion.
Joint wave-equation inversion of time-lapse seismic data