next up previous print clean
Next: Appendix B: Crack-influence Decomposition Up: Appendix A: Bounds and Previous: Peselnick-Meister-Watt (PMW) Bounds for

Self-consistent Estimates for Hexagonal Symmetry

The results obtained for self-consistent estimates can be written in many different ways (Berryman, 2005). We take the self-consistent estimate for bulk modulus to be  
 \begin{displaymath}
K^* = \frac{K_V(G_{\rm eff}^r + \zeta^*)}
{(G_{\rm eff}^v + ...
 ...{(G_{\rm eff}^vK_R + \zeta^*K_V)}{(G_{\rm eff}^v + \zeta^*)},
 \end{displaymath} (34)
where  
 \begin{displaymath}
\zeta^* = \frac{G^*}{6}\left(\frac{9K^*+8G^*}{K^*+2G^*}\right).
 \end{displaymath} (35)
In (35), K* is determined by (34), depending also on G*; G* is determined by the self-consistent expression for the shear modulus to follow, also depending on K*; and $\zeta^*$ is then determined by (35). The final result for G* = G*hex in polycrystals having grains with hexagonal symmetry is  
 \begin{displaymath}
\frac{1}{G_{\rm hex}^* + \zeta^*} = 
\frac{1}{5}\left[\frac{...
 ...+ \frac{2}{C_{44}+\zeta^*} + \frac{2}{C_{66}+\zeta^*}\right].
 \end{displaymath} (36)
These formulas can be successfully solved by iteration, starting for example by using values corresponding to upper or lower bounds for the values of K* and G*. Some details of the derivation of these formulas can be found in Willis (1977, 1981) and Berryman (2005).


next up previous print clean
Next: Appendix B: Crack-influence Decomposition Up: Appendix A: Bounds and Previous: Peselnick-Meister-Watt (PMW) Bounds for
Stanford Exploration Project
1/16/2007