next up previous print clean
Next: 2- and 3-D earth Up: A surface-related multiple prediction Previous: A surface-related multiple prediction

One-dimensional earth and impulsive source

Let's define u0 as the primary wavefield and u1 the surface-related, first-order multiple wavefield recorded at the surface. If the earth varies only as a function of depth, then u will not depend on both s and g, but only on the offset, h=g-s. In this one-dimensional case, equation ([*]) becomes
      \begin{eqnarray}
u_1(g-s) & = & \int u_0(g-g') \; u_0(g'-s) \; dg' \\ u_1(h) & = & \int u_0(h-h') \; u_0(h') \; dh',\end{eqnarray} (144)
(145)
where h'=g'-s. Equation ([*]) clearly represents a convolution, so can be computed by multiplication in the Fourier domain such that

 
U1(kh) = U0(kh)2,

(146)

where Ui(kh) is the Fourier transform of ui(h) defined by  
 \begin{displaymath}
U_i(k_h) = \int u_i(h) \; e^{-2 \pi i k_h h} dh.\end{displaymath} (147)

Equation ([*]) can be extended to deal with a smoothly varying earth by considering common shot-gathers (or common midpoint gathers) independently, and assuming the earth is locally one-dimensional in the vicinity of the shot, e.g., Rickett and Guitton (2000):

 
U1(kh,s) = U0(kh,s)2.

(148)

In practice, however, the primaries are not known and u0 is replaced by the data with primaries and multiples. A similar approach has been used by Kelamis and Verschuur (2000) for attenuating surface-related multiples on land data for relatively flat geology.


next up previous print clean
Next: 2- and 3-D earth Up: A surface-related multiple prediction Previous: A surface-related multiple prediction
Stanford Exploration Project
5/5/2005