next up previous print clean
Next: A look at the Up: Alvarez et al.: Diffracted Previous: Apex-shifted Radon Transform

Sparsity Constraint

As a linear transformation, the apex-shifted Radon transform can be represented simply as  
 \begin{displaymath}
\mathbf{d}=\mathbf{Lm}
,\end{displaymath} (1)
where ${\bf d}$ is the image in the angle domain, ${\bf m}$ is the image in the Radon domain and ${\bf L}$ is the forward apex-shifted Radon transform operator. To find the model ${\bf m}$ that best fits the data in a least-squares sense, we minimize the objective function:  
 \begin{displaymath}
f({\bf m}) = \Vert{\bf Lm-d}\Vert^2 + \epsilon^2b^2 \sum_{i=1}^n \ln\Big(1 +\frac{m_i^2}{b^2}\Big),\end{displaymath} (2)
where the second term is a Cauchy regularization that enforces sparseness in the model space. Here n is the size of the model space, and ${\epsilon}$ and b are two constants chosen a-priori: ${\epsilon}$ which controls the amount of sparseness in the model space and b related to the minimum value below which everything in the Radon domain should be zeroed Sava and Guitton (2003). The least-squares inverse of ${\bf m}$ is
\begin{displaymath}
{\bf \hat{m}} = 
\left [
 {\bf L'L}+\epsilon^2 {\bf diag}\Big(\frac{1}{1+\frac{m_i^2}{b^2}}\Big)
\right ]^{-1}{\bf L'd},\end{displaymath} (3)
where ${\bf diag}$ defines a diagonal operator. Because the model space can be large, we estimate ${\bf m}$ iteratively. Notice that the objective function in Equation (2) is non-linear because the model appears in the definition of the regularization term. Therefore, we use a limited-memory quasi-Newton method Guitton and Symes (2003) to find the minimum of $f({\bf m})$.


next up previous print clean
Next: A look at the Up: Alvarez et al.: Diffracted Previous: Apex-shifted Radon Transform
Stanford Exploration Project
5/23/2004