next up previous print clean
Next: Kolmogorov review Up: Spectral factorization of seismic Previous: Time-distance helioseismology

Model of stochastic oscillations

Under an assumption of translational invariance, we can model the acoustic oscillation recorded in solar dopplergrams as a stochastic source function convolved with a Green's function impulse response. After a three-dimensional Fourier transform, the convolution becomes a simple multiplication:  
 \begin{displaymath}
D(k_x,k_y,\omega)=S(k_x,k_y,\omega) G(k_x,k_y,\omega),\end{displaymath} (1)
where D is the observed data, S is the source function, and G is the impulse response. We are interested in the three-dimensional time-space acoustic impulse response, g(x,y,t). As it stands, however, equation ([*]) has many more unknowns than knowns, so additional assumptions are required before we can estimate G.

Secondly, we assume s(x,y,t) is white in space and time, or equivalently, $S {\bar S}=1$, where the ${\bar S}$ denotes the complex conjugate of S. If this is not true in practice, spectral color from the source function will leak into the derived impulse response.

Under this assumption, equation ([*]) reduces to the statement that the power spectrum of the impulse response equals the power spectrum of the data,
\begin{displaymath}
\left\vert D \right\vert^2 = \left\vert G \right\vert^2.\end{displaymath} (2)
While defining the amplitude spectrum of G, this equation places no constraints on its phase, and so we need an additional assumption to ensure a unique solution.

We will assume that G is a minimum-phase function, where a minimum-phase function is defined as a causal function with a causal convolutional inverse. It turns out that many physical systems (from electronics to acoustics) have this property. For example, consider the function that maps stress to strain and vice versa: if you specify the stress in a solid, the strain will react accordingly, leading to a causal function relating stress to strain. However, you could also specify the strain in the solid, and then the observed-stress would be a causal function of the strain. Since these two functions are inverse processes, they clearly satisfy the minimum-phase definition.

If this model holds true, then estimating the impulse response reduces to estimating a minimum-phase function with the same ($\omega,k_x,k_y$) spectrum as the original data: or equivalently, multi-dimensional spectral factorization.



 
next up previous print clean
Next: Kolmogorov review Up: Spectral factorization of seismic Previous: Time-distance helioseismology
Stanford Exploration Project
5/27/2001