next up previous print clean
Next: Marmousi synthetic Up: Tests Previous: Tests

Constant-velocity synthetic

 
cup
Figure 1
Reflector model for the constant-velocity test
cup
view burn build edit restore

A sinusoidal reflector shown in Figure 1 creates complicated reflection data, shown in Figure 2 before and after the normal-moveout correction. The syncline parts of the reflector lead to traveltime triplications at sufficiently large offset. A mixture of different dips from the triplications would make it extremely difficult to interpolate the data in individual common-offset gathers, such as those shown in Figure 2. The plots of time slices after NMO (Figure 3) clearly show that the data are also non-stationary in the offset direction. Therefore, a simple offset interpolation scheme would also fail.

 
data
data
Figure 2
Prestack common-offset gathers for the constant-velocity test. Left: before NMO. Right: after NMO. Top, center, and bottom plots correspond to different offsets.
[*] view burn build edit restore

 
tslice
tslice
Figure 3
Time slices of the prestack data at different times (after NMO).
view burn build edit restore

To set up an interpolation experiment, I randomly removed half of the traces in the original data and attempted to reconstruct them. Figure 4 shows the reconstruction process on individual frequency slices. Despite the complex and non-stationary character of the reflection events in the frequency domain, the offset continuation equation is able to reconstruct them quite accurately from the decimated data.

 
fslice
fslice
Figure 4
Interpolation in frequency slices. Left: input data 50% of the traces are randomly removed). Right: interpolation output. Top, bottom, and middle plots correspond to different frequencies. Real parts of the complex-valued data are shown.
[*] view burn build edit restore

Figure 5 shows the input and the result of interpolation after transforming it back to the time domain. A comparison of the interpolation result with the ideal output (Figure 2) shows that the reflection data are nearly perfectly interpolated even in the complex triplication zones.

 
all
all
Figure 5
Interpolation in common-offset gathers. Left: input data (50% of the traces are randomly removed). Right: interpolation output. Top, center, and bottom plots correspond to different common-offset gathers.
[*] view burn build edit restore

The constant-velocity test results allow us to conclude that, when all the assumptions of the offset continuation theory are met, we can easily accomplish an accurate interpolation. In the next subsection, I deal with the more complicated case of Marmousi.


next up previous print clean
Next: Marmousi synthetic Up: Tests Previous: Tests
Stanford Exploration Project
4/28/2000