next up previous print clean
Next: Examples Up: Fomel & Prucha: Angle-gather Previous: Traveltime considerations

Amplitude considerations

One simple approach to amplitude weighting for angle-gather migration is based again on Cheops' pyramid considerations. Stacking along the pyramid in the data space is a double integration in midpoint and offset coordinates. Angle-gather migration implies the change of coordinates from $\{x,h\}$ to $\{\alpha,\gamma\}$. The change of coordinates leads to weighting the integrand by the following Jacobian transformation:  
 \begin{displaymath}
 dx\,dh = \left\vert \det \left(
 \begin{array}
{cc}
 \frac{...
 ...tial \gamma}
 \end{array} \right) \right\vert\,d\alpha\,d\gamma\end{displaymath} (11)
Substituting formulas (5) and (6) into equation (11) gives us the following analytical expression for the Jacobian weighting:  
 \begin{displaymath}
 W_{\mbox{J}} = \left\vert \det \left(
 \begin{array}
{cc}
 ...
 ... = 
 \frac{z^2}{\left(\cos{\alpha}^2 - \sin{\gamma}^2\right)^2}\end{displaymath} (12)
Weighting (12) should be applied in addition to the weighting used in common-offset migration. By analyzing formula (12), we can see that the weight increases with the reflector depth and peaks where the angles $\alpha$ and $\gamma$approach condition (10).

The Jacobian weighting approach, however, does not provide physically meaningful amplitudes, when migrated angle gathers are considered individually. In order to obtain a physically meaningful amplitude, we can turn to the asymptotic theory of true-amplitude migration Goldin (1992); Schleicher et al. (1993); Tygel et al. (1994). The true-amplitude weighting provides an asymptotic high-frequency amplitude proportional to the reflection coefficient, with the wave propagation (geometric spreading) effects removed. The generic true-amplitude weighting formula Fomel (1996b) transforms in the case of 2-D angle-gather time migration to the form:  
 \begin{displaymath}
 W_{\mbox{TA}} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\,\pi}}\,
 \frac{\sqrt{L_s\...
 ...\partial^2 L_r}{\partial \xi \partial \gamma} 
 \right\vert\;, \end{displaymath} (13)
where Ls and Lr are the ray lengths from the reflector point to the source and the receiver respectively. After some heavy algebra, the true-amplitude expression takes the form  
 \begin{displaymath}
 W_{\mbox{TA}} = \frac{2\,z\,\sin{\alpha}}{\sqrt{2\,\pi} v}\...
 ...amma}}
 {\left(\cos^2{\alpha} - \sin^2{\gamma}\right)^{5/2}}\;.\end{displaymath} (14)
Under the constant-velocity assumption and in high-frequency asymptotic, this weighting produces an output, proportional to the reflection coefficient, when applied for creating an angle gather with the reflection angle $\gamma$. Despite the strong assumptions behind this approach, it might be useful in practice for post-migration amplitude-versus-angle studies. Unlike the conventional common-offset migration, the angle-gather approach produces the output directly in reflection angle coordinates. One can use the generic true-amplitude theory Fomel (1996b) for extending formula (14) to the 3-D and 2.5-D cases.


next up previous print clean
Next: Examples Up: Fomel & Prucha: Angle-gather Previous: Traveltime considerations
Stanford Exploration Project
4/20/1999