Next: Our route
Up: Introduction
Previous: Processing versus inversion
In mathematical statistics is a well-established theory
called
``linear inverse theory.''
``Geophysical inverse theory'' is similar,
with the additions that
(1) variables can be sample points from a continuum, and
(2) physical problems are often intractable without linearization.
Once I imagined a book
that would derive techniques used in industry
from general geophysical inverse theory.
After thirty years of experience I can report to you
that very few techniques in routine practical use
arise directly from the general theory!
There are many reasons for this,
and I have chosen to sprinkle
them throughout discussion of the applications themselves
rather than attempt a revision to the general theory.
I summarize here as follows:
the computing requirements of the general theory
are typically unrealistic since they are proportional to the cube
of a huge number of variables,
which are sample values representing a continuum.
Equally important,
the great diversity of spatial and temporal aspects
of data and residuals (statistical nonstationarity)
is impractical to characterize in general terms.
Next: Our route
Up: Introduction
Previous: Processing versus inversion
Stanford Exploration Project
10/21/1998