A particularly interesting factor is (1-Z), because the filter
(1,-1) is like a time derivative.
The time-derivative filter destroys
zero frequency
in the input signal.
The zero frequency is with a Z-transform
.To see that the filter (1-Z) destroys zero frequency,
notice that
.More formally,
consider output Y(Z)=(1-Z)X(Z) made from the filter (1-Z)
and any input X(Z).
Since (1-Z) vanishes at Z=1,
then likewise Y(Z) must vanish at Z=1.
Vanishing at Z=1 is vanishing at frequency
because
from (20).
Now we can recognize that multiplication of two functions of Z
or of
is the equivalent of convolving the associated
time functions.
Multiplication in the frequency domain is convolution in the time domain. |
A popular mathematical abbreviation for the convolution operator is
an asterisk:
equation (9), for example,
could be denoted by
.I do not disagree with asterisk notation,
but I prefer the equivalent expression Y(Z)=X(Z)B(Z),
which simultaneously exhibits
the time domain and the frequency domain.
The filter (1-Z) is often called a ``differentiator.'' It is displayed in Figure 7.
![]() |
The letter ``z'' plotted at the origin
in Figure 7
denotes the root
of 1-Z at Z=1, where .Another interesting filter is 1+Z, which destroys
the highest possible frequency
,where
.
A root is a numerical value for which a polynomial vanishes.
For example, vanishes
whenever Z=-2 or Z=1.
Such a root is also called a ``zero.''
The fundamental theorem of algebra says that if the highest
power of Z in a polynomial is ZN, then the polynomial
has exactly N roots,
not necessarily distinct.
As N gets large, finding these roots requires
a sophisticated computer program.
Another complication is that complex numbers can arise.
We will soon see that complex roots are exactly what we need
to design filters that destroy any frequency.