next up [*] print clean
Next: About this document ... Up: Table of Contents

Anti-aliased Kirchhoff 3-D migration

D. E. Lumley, J. F. Claerbout, D. Bevc

Author has no known email address

ABSTRACT

A significant degradation in the quality of Kirchhoff 3-D migration images often arises because the migration operator summation trajectory is too steep for the input seismic trace spacing and frequency content. We present an operator anti-aliasing method that suppresses this problem, based on local triangle filtering. The N-point anti-alias triangles are efficiently applied as 3-point filters after causal and anticausal integration of the seismic trace data. We implement our method on a massively parallel CM-5 in a memory and floating-point efficient algorithm, and compare our anti-aliasing method to a standard Kirchhoff migration using a 3-D salt intrusion dataset from the Gulf of Mexico. Our results indicate that our anti-aliasing method greatly enhances the 3-D resolution of steep salt-sediment interfaces and faults, and suppresses false reflections caused by conventional Kirchhoff-migration aliasing artifacts.

INTRODUCTION The process of seismic migration involves a mapping of the input seismic trace data by a migration operator to the output structural image. Spatial aliasing of the migration process can be problematic in all three domains: data, operator and image. These three types of spatial aliasing are distinct and independent, although they are often confused.

Aliasing defined Data aliasing occurs when there are seismic frequencies f and dips $\theta$ along reflection and diffraction events in recorded seismic data which violate the following criterion: $f \le f_d = v_r/(4\sin\theta_r\Delta x)$. The term fd is the maximum unaliased frequency in the data for a given trace spacing $\Delta x$, a velocity vr at the receiver location, and a local plane-wave incident angle $\theta_r$ at the recording surface. Once data have been aliased during the recording process, it is difficult to avoid subsequent processing artifacts except by reshooting the survey at a finer group spacing, or by trying to interpolate the original data without interpolating the aliases, e.g., Spitz (1991) and Claerbout (1992). Yilmaz (1988) gives a good overview of data aliasing and its effects on all methods of migration.

Image aliasing occurs when the output sampling of the image space is too coarse to properly represent migrated dips. In the case of Kirchhoff migration, image aliasing is mostly a cosmetic problem and can be remedied by choosing an appropriate image mesh upon which to estimate the migrated structural image. Note that the Kirchhoff-migrated values at each mesh point in an aliased image space are uncontaminated and correct (assuming no data or operator aliasing). For example, a single migrated output trace at a well location may be entirely accurate without having to estimate any adjacent migrated traces. This ``target-oriented'' capability of Kirchhoff migration is not possible with spectral or finite-difference migration methods. Kirchhoff image aliasing may be a problem, however, if the migrated image is needed as input to subsequent multi-channel processing.

Operator aliasing occurs when the operator dip along the migration summation trajectory is too steep for a given input seismic trace spacing and frequency content. Spatial aliasing of Kirchhoff integral operators is likely because the operators are designed in the discrete space-time domain rather than the spectral domain. Great care must be taken to ensure that the f-k spectrum of a given space-time operator contains no aliased energy wrapped beyond the Nyquist frequency and wavenumbers. This implies that space-time operators which are spatially undersampled and contain significant steep-dip and high-frequency energy are likely to suffer from severe operator aliasing. In contrast, migration operators designed explicitly in the f-k domain are unaliased by definition, and operators designed in the f-x domain are easily modified to suppress spatial aliasing.

Previous work Conventionally, anti-aliasing of Kirchhoff operators can be partially accomplished by trace interpolation, aperture control, and operator dip filtering. Trace interpolation decreases the spatial sample interval and thus increases the spatial Nyquist frequency, but at the potentially prohibitive cost of increasing the total 3-D migration input load (e.g., Yilmaz, 1988). Migration aperture-control and operator dip-filtering have the effect of suppressing aliased steep-dip contributions to the output image. Unfortunately, these suppressed steep dips may be precisely the events of interest when imaging near-vertical structure such as salt flanks and faults.

Hale (1991) proposed a method to anti-alias Kirchhoff dip-moveout (DMO) operators by replicating time-shifted versions of the input seismic traces to approximate a summation along an equal-time-sampled version of the operator. Hale's subsequent nearest-neighbor spatial interpolation implies a boxcar averaging of the input trace values along the time direction, whereas we use triangle filtering to increase accuracy at steep migration dips. Hale's test of summing DMO impulse responses and matching the result to the original impulse ensures both operator aliasing and image aliasing are suppressed, which may invoke more lowpass-filtering and loss of resolution than is strictly necessary for the case of migration operator anti-aliasing alone. Hale's replication of time-shifted input traces and spatial interpolations may be inefficient from both a floating-point and memory perspective for 3-D migration algorithms, such as ours, that process thousands of traces simultaneously.

Gray (1992) proposed an approximate but cost-effective method to anti-alias Kirchhoff migration operators by performing aperture-dependent lowpass temporal filtering of the input trace data. He suggested that approximately three copies of the input data be lowpass-filtered at different high-cut frequencies. During migration the wide-aperture portions of the migration operator would be drawn increasingly from the lowest-frequency-content filtered trace copies. This corresponds to the notion that the wide-aperture portions of the migration operator have the steepest dips and therefore only the lowest frequencies will be unaliased. Our method is more accurate because we calculate the complete vector of high-cut frequencies separately for each diffraction trajectory, and design and apply our anti-alias filters on the fly accordingly. Our method is as cost-effective as Gray's approach, but does not require the memory-intensive storage of multiple data copies to implement the anti-aliasing.

We present an improved method for anti-aliasing Kirchhoff migrations. We first derive the relevant operator aliasing criteria and then present our efficient method of anti-aliasing the migration operator by local triangle filtering of the seismic trace. Finally, we compare applications of our anti-aliased Kirchhoff migration to conventional aperture-weighted Kirchhoff migration on a 3-D marine seismic data example.

ANTI-ALIASING THEORY The operator anti-aliasing criterion defines the maximum unaliased temporal frequency in the seismic data at the location that the operator trajectory intercepts a seismic trace, and is a function of the local operator dip and the trace spacing. In order to remain unaliased, the sequence of seismic trace samples summed along the operator trajectory must satisfy the dip Nyquist sampling criterion:

 
 \begin{displaymath}
f_{max} \le \frac{1}{2\Delta T} = 
 \frac{1}{2 \, (\d t_k/\d \rho)\, \Delta\rho} \;.\end{displaymath} (1)

The geometry of the operator anti-aliasing criterion is depicted in Figure [*]. The factor $\Delta T$ is the moveout time along the migration operator between adjacent traces. The term $\d t_k/\d \rho$ is the local spatial derivative of the migration operator trajectory at the point of intersection with the seismic trace, and $\Delta\rho$ is the seismic trace spacing along the recording surface. The anti-aliasing criterion (1) suggests local lowpass filtering of the seismic trace to ensure that frequencies larger than fmax are not incorrectly migrated into the output image. As discussed later, we implement the anti-aliasing lowpass filtering efficiently and robustly with local triangle filters.

 
op-alias
op-alias
Figure 1
The geometry of the operator anti-aliasing criterion.

Kirchhoff time migration It is instructive to evaluate the anti-aliasing criterion for the special case of Kirchhoff time migration, which can be extended to the case of Kirchhoff depth migration. For time migration, we derive an expression for the anti-aliasing criterion (1) by analytically evaluating the operator derivative term $\d t_k/\d \rho$.We begin by considering the analytic expression of the Kirchhoff 3-D prestack time migration operator, which has the form

 
 \begin{displaymath}
t_k \; = \; t_s + t_r \; \approx \; 
 \sqrt{\left(\frac{\rho...
 ...2 } + 
 \sqrt{\left(\frac{\rho_{r}}{v}\right)^2 + \tau^2 } \; .\end{displaymath} (2)

As shown in the geometry of Figure [*], the term tk=ts + tr is the total two-way Kirchhoff migration reflection traveltime, $\tau$ is the one-way vertical traveltime or pseudo-depth to the reflection point, and v is the rms migration velocity that varies as a function of surface location and pseudo-depth $(x,y,\tau)$.The lengths $\rho_{s}$ and $\rho_{r}$ are the distances measured along the planar recording surface between the source or receiver, respectively, to the vertical projection of the image point on the recording surface, expressed as

 
 \begin{displaymath}
\rho_{\star} \; = \; \sqrt{ (x_i-x_{\star})^2 + (y_i-y_{\star})^2 } 
\; ,\end{displaymath} (3)

Equation (3) assumes that the recording surface is a horizontal plane at a constant datum depth z0. The subscript $\star$ is a wildcard for either the source or receiver coordinate subscripts s and r, and the subscript i refers to the surface location of the subsurface image point projected up onto the recording surface.

 
geometry
geometry
Figure 2
3-D prestack migration geometry.

The spatial derivative of (2) is needed to determine the migration operator aliasing criterion, which can be derived as

 
 \begin{displaymath}
\frac{\d t_k}{\d \rho} \; = \; 
 + \sqrt{ \left( \frac{\d t_...
 ...left( \frac{\rho_{s}}{t_s} + \frac{\rho_{r}}{t_r} \right) 
 \;.\end{displaymath} (4)

We evaluate the effective rms spatial sampling interval $\Delta\rho$ for the prestack migration operator as

 
 \begin{displaymath}
\Delta\rho \; \approx \; \sqrt{ \frac{1}{2} \left( dx_s^2 + dy_s^2 +
 dx_r^2 + dy_r^2 \right) }\end{displaymath} (5)

where we define $dx_{\star}$ and $dy_{\star}$ in the prestack case as

 
 \begin{displaymath}
dx_{\star} \; = \; \frac{\vert x_i - x_{\star} \vert \Delta x }{\rho_{\star}}\end{displaymath} (6)
and  
 \begin{displaymath}
dy_{\star} \; = \; \frac{\vert y_i - y_{\star} \vert \Delta y }{\rho_{\star}}
 \; .\end{displaymath} (7)

The terms $\Delta x$ and $\Delta y$ are the true inline and crossline sampling intervals of the seismic trace data, and are assumed to be regular but possibly unequal in length. A more complicated analysis is required for irregular trace spacings, which this paper does not address.

Given the analytic expressions for the spatial derivative of the Kirchhoff time migration operator $\d t_k/\d \rho$, and the definition of the areal trace spacing interval $\Delta\rho$, we derive an analytic expression for the time migration operator anti-aliasing criterion. For the prestack case, the anti-aliasing criterion is

 
 \begin{displaymath}
f_{max} \le \frac{v^2}{2\Delta\rho} \left( \frac{\rho_s}{t_s} +
 \frac{\rho_r}{t_r}\right)^{-1} 
 \;\;\; ,\end{displaymath} (8)

where the prestack definition of $\Delta\rho$ given by (5) - (7) must be used.

Kirchhoff depth migration In contrast to the time migration method above, the depth migration anti-aliasing criterion does not have a general analytic solution. Kirchhoff depth migration operators in v(x,y,z) media do not have simple hyperbolic forms, and must be evaluated numerically in heterogeneous migration velocity models. However, we propose three methods to provide satisfactory depth migration anti-aliasing results.

The first and most straightforward method is simply to use the rms velocity field v and the time migration anti-aliasing criterion (8), of the previous section, to design the anti-aliasing lowpass filters along the non-hyperbolic depth migration operators. This approach is robust because the dip along the time migration operator is a reasonable approximation to the average dip $\d t_k/\d \rho$ along the true depth migration trajectory.

The second depth migration anti-aliasing technique applies to Kirchhoff depth migration driven by traveltime tables. In this case, the operator derivative $\d t_k/\d \rho$ in the general anti-aliasing criterion (1) can be evaluated by differencing the source and receiver traveltimes at the trace location with respect to an adjacent source and receiver location. This approach is more accurate than the time migration approximation, but requires extra memory and I/O overhead to load the adjacent traveltime tables, or extra computation time if the adjacent traveltimes are interpolated from a sparse set of traveltime tables already loaded into memory.

The third depth migration anti-aliasing technique applies to Kirchhoff depth migration in which the traveltime values are computed by raytracing on the fly. In this case, an extra set of rays can be traced from adjacent source and receiver locations down to all subsurface points, or interpolated from a single set of dynamic rays by paraxial interpolation. Then the difference in ray arrival times can be used to approximate the operator derivative $\d t_k/\d \rho$ in (1). This method is more computationally intensive than the traveltime table approach, but has significantly smaller memory requirements.

In the sections that follow, we assume that the operator derivative $\d t_k/\d \rho$ of equation (1) is a known quantity, whether for time or depth migration, since it can be calculated by any of the three methods described above.

ANTI-ALIAS FILTER DESIGN Given that we know the maximum unaliased frequency fmax at each point along the migration operator, we need to design a method to locally lowpass filter the seismic data in order to satisfy the anti-aliasing criterion (1). We implement the local lowpass filters as triangular smoothing. The Z-transform representation of an arbitrary N-point triangle filter can be expressed as

 
 \begin{displaymath}
g(z) = \frac{ -z^{-k-1} + 2 - z^{k+1} }{\alpha (1-z)(1-z^{-1})}
\;,\end{displaymath} (9)

where the triangle length N = 2k+1, and the filter scaling coefficient $\alpha = (k+1)^2$. The amplitude spectrum of the triangle filter can be derived as

 
 \begin{displaymath}
A(\omega) = \frac{ \sin^2(\omega\Delta t(k+1)/2) }{ \sin^2(\omega\Delta t/2) }
\;,\end{displaymath} (10)

which is the discrete version of a continuous sinc2 function, and has spectral notches at the frequencies

 
 \begin{displaymath}
f_n = \frac{\omega_n}{2\pi} = \frac{n}{(k+1)\Delta t} \;\;;\;\; n=1,2,3,\ldots
\;.\end{displaymath} (11)

We design the triangle filter length N such that the maximum unaliased frequency fmax is equal to the first notch in the triangle spectrum at frequency f1. Equating the anti-aliasing criterion (1) to the first triangle filter notch frequency of (11), we derive the appropriate anti-aliasing triangle filter length N to be

 
 \begin{displaymath}
N \ge \max( \;\; 
 4 \left( \frac{\d t_k}{\d \rho}\right) \frac{\Delta\rho}{\Delta t} - 1\,, \;\;
 1 \;\; )
\;.\end{displaymath} (12)

The value of the local migration operator dip $\d t_k/\d \rho$ is given by equation (4) in the case of time migration, or by the methods discussed in the previous section on depth migration.

Furthermore, we note that the denominator of g(z) represents a causal integration of the trace with 1/(1-z), followed by an anticausal trace integration with 1/(1-z-1). The numerator of g(z) is a gapped three-point Laplacian operator, where the length of the gap (k+1) determines the triangle length N and high-cut frequency fmax. Therefore, if the input trace data are integrated twice before migration, an arbitrary N-point anti-alias triangle filter can be designed and applied on the fly for the cost of a three-point operator. This observation offers a large savings in computational effort when applying the triangle filters.

Figure [*] shows a schematic diagram of a migration impulse response filtered with the anti-aliasing triangles. The triangle filters get longer with increasing operator dip in order to suppress aliasing of high temporal frequencies. The peak amplitude of the triangle should decrease as the filter length increases according to the factor $\alpha$ in Equation (9), but this is not shown in the diagram of Figure [*].

 
triangles
triangles
Figure 3
A schematic diagram of a migration operator that has been anti-aliased with triangle filters. The peak amplitude of the triangles should decrease with increasing triangle length, but this is not portrayed in the diagram.

DATA EXAMPLES We compare examples of standard Kirchhoff migration with our anti-aliased migration method. Standard migration is defined here as Kirchhoff migration with a $\cos^2\theta$ operator dip filter and a 45-degree migration aperture. The anti-aliased migration is a full-aperture migration with no operator dip-filtering except as supplied by the anti-aliasing triangle filters.

Zero-dip migration aliasing The first example illustrates the method in the absence of data aliasing. Figure [*] shows a stacked section from offshore Florida which exhibits a strong bottom simulating reflection (BSR) due to the presence of a frozen methane-hydrate layer overlaying a free-methane gas-saturated layer. The deepwater seafloor reflection, the BSR and the flat spot at the base of the free-gas layer are labeled. This data is the subject of an AVO analysis by Ecker and Lumley (1993a, 1993b, 1994). The stacked section clearly shows that the geologic structure is near zero-dip, and therefore the prestack data are not likely to suffer from much spatial data-aliasing.

 
stack-ann
stack-ann
Figure 4
A deepwater stacked section offshore Florida showing the seafloor, a methane-hydrate BSR, and a flat spot at the base of a free-methane gas-saturated layer.

Although the data are not aliased, the migration operator certainly is. Figure [*] shows a migration ``impulse response'' which is obtained by migrating ten adjacent prestack traces in a common-offset section with the standard Kirchhoff method defined above. Note the severe checkerboard ``speckling'' along steep parts of the migration responses which is a common indicator of operator aliasing. Although the structure is nearly horizontal and the data are not aliased, the migration operator is aliased because the migration velocity is low (water), and the trace spacing is fairly coarse at 50 m interval sampling. Low migration velocity and coarse trace spacings conspire to reduce the maximum temporal frequency that remains unaliased along steep operator dips, as related by Equation (8). Figure [*] shows the migration result using our operator anti-aliasing method instead of standard operator aperture-control and dip-filtering. Nearly all of the aliased speckling has been correctly suppressed.

 
impUA
impUA
Figure 5
The standard migration response to ten adjacent common-offset traces. Note the severe speckling that is a certain indicator of operator aliasing.

 
impAA
impAA
Figure 6
Our anti-aliased migration response on ten adjacent common-offset traces. Note that the operator-aliasing artifact-speckle has been correctly suppressed.

Figure [*] shows a common-offset migration using the standard Kirchhoff method. In comparison to the stacked section of Figure [*], many artifacts of operator aliasing are evident. Especially noteworthy is the fact that the zone above the seafloor has been severely contaminated by aliasing artifacts that give the appearance of false reflectivity structure within the seawater! Additionally, the region between the seafloor and the BSR has been contaminated, but in a more surreptitious manner. Figure [*] shows the same migration using our anti-aliasing method. Note that the seawater artifacts have been suppressed and the structure between the seafloor and the BSR has a clear image.

 
migUA
migUA
Figure 7
A common-offset prestack migration with the standard Kirchhoff method. Note the false structure within the seawater zone caused by operator aliasing artifacts.

 
migAA
migAA
Figure 8
A common-offset prestack migration with the our anti-aliased Kirchhoff method. Note the false structure aliasing artifacts have been suppressed, and this image compares favorably with the original stacked section.

3-D anti-aliased migration We now compare our anti-aliased Kirchhoff migration to a conventional aperture-weighted Kirchhoff migration, both implemented on a Connection Machine CM-5. Preliminary 3-D results were shown at the SEG 3-D workshop by Lumley and Claerbout (1993).

The input data approximately represent a 10 km by 10 km surface stack area. The stacked data were decimated to a 50 m by 50 m bin sampling interval in the inline and crossline directions for the purposes of this study. Normally, for the steep dips present on near-vertical faults and salt boundaries, this data would require oversampling by at least a factor of 16 to help suppress aliasing in the migrated image, which is an expensive and possibly prohibitive multiplier. We note that, although these migrations are only 3-D poststack time migrations, the effects of anti-aliasing in the images are dramatic. The anti-aliasing improvements are expected to be even more dramatic for both poststack depth and prestack time/depth migration.

Inline sections
Figures [*] and [*] show inline sections sliced from the standard and anti-aliased 3-D migration cubes. The crossline position of these inline sections is at y = 3.7 km. Due to the sparse sampling of the surface stacked trace bins, the standard migration is severely aliased, even with the 45 degree migration aperture and $\cos^2\theta$ operator dip filtering. Our anti-aliased image is much clearer, and shows a package of sediments faulted in the center by underlying salt which is pushing upwards. Figures [*] and [*] show inline sections sliced from the standard and anti-aliased 3-D migration cubes. The crossline position of these inline sections is at y = 6.15 km. Again, our anti-aliased migration is superior, and clearly images a heavily faulted (2 sec) and folded (3 sec) package of sediments cradled in an arm of the salt body which synclines at 3 km inline distance.

Crossline section
Figures [*] and [*] show crossline sections sliced from the standard and anti-aliased 3-D migration cubes. The inline position of these crossline sections is at x=5.5 km. The standard migration is severely distorted by 3-D migration operator aliasing. Our anti-aliased migration, however, gives a clear image of the structure, including an anticlinal sediment package with a large vertical fault throw at 2 seconds and 6 km crossline distance. The top of salt is fairly well imaged at the base of the folded sediments.

Time slices
Figures [*] and [*] show time slices cut from the standard and anti-aliased 3-D migration cubes. The pseudodepth of each slice is at 1.496 migrated seconds. This time slice skims the very top of the salt intrusion body where it first pokes its head up through the deeper sediments. The edges of the salt body fall almost vertically down into the deeper sediments. These steep dips are crisply imaged in the anti-aliased migration, but not visible at all in the standard migration image. Also, ``waves'' of folded sediments outline the top of the salt intrusion like ripples around a piece of floating wood. Nothing discernable is resolved in the standard migration time slice.

Figures [*] and [*] show deeper time slices cut from the standard and anti-aliased 3-D migration cubes. The pseudodepth of each slice is at 1.744 migrated seconds. Again, the standard migration image is difficult to interpret. Our anti-aliased migration, however, clearly shows the intersection of the salt sediment-cap with the time slice horizon. Note that the cylindrical shape of the top of salt causes the flanking sediments to strike at 45 degrees to the acquisition geometry, and the tip of the salt peninsula causes the anticlinal sediment feature to the northwest. There is a large fault with about 500 m lateral throw at (x,y) coordinate (5,6) km, another fault just clipped in the image at (x,y) coordinate (8.5,8.5) km. Additionally, there are two vertical faults in the top right corner which bound a set of steeply-dipping folded sediment layers.

CONCLUSIONS We have presented an anti-aliasing method for Kirchhoff migration operators, based on local triangle filtering. The N-point triangles are efficiently applied as 3-point filters after causal and anticausal integration of the seismic trace data. This method is well suited for parallel processing algorithms, where storage of multiple copies of various high-cut filtered versions of the input data is often not practical. We compare the anti-aliasing method to a standard Kirchhoff 3-D migration, using a salt intrusion dataset from the Gulf of Mexico. Our results indicate that careful operator anti-aliasing can enhance steep-dip reflections from faults and salt-sediment interfaces during the process of 3-D seismic migration imaging. Our method is applicable to other Kirchhoff space-time operators such as NMO velocity stacking and DMO.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Dave Nichols, Biondo Biondi and Stew Levin for helpful comments on the subject of operator aliasing. Mihai Popovici arranged for Halliburton Geophysical Services to provide the 3-D salt intrusion dataset used in this study.

 
x73UA
x73UA
Figure 9
Standard 3-D migrated inline section at a crossline position of 3.7 km.

 
x73AA
x73AA
Figure 10
Anti-aliased 3-D migrated inline section at a crossline position of 3.7 km.

 
x122UA
x122UA
Figure 11
Standard 3-D migrated inline section at a crossline position of 6.15 km.

 
x122AA
x122AA
Figure 12
Anti-aliased 3-D migrated inline section at a crossline position of 6.15 km.

 
y109UA
y109UA
Figure 13
Standard 3-D migrated crossline section at an inline position of 5.5 km.

 
y109AA
y109AA
Figure 14
Anti-aliased 3-D migrated crossline section at an inline position of 5.5 km.

 
z187UA
z187UA
Figure 15
Standard 3-D migrated time slice at a pseudodepth of 1.496 seconds.

 
z187AA
z187AA
Figure 16
Anti-aliased 3-D migrated time slice at a pseudodepth of 1.496 seconds.

 
z218UA
z218UA
Figure 17
Standard 3-D migrated time slice at a pseudodepth of 1.744 seconds.

 
z218AA
z218AA
Figure 18
Anti-aliased 3-D migrated time slice at a pseudodepth of 1.744 seconds.

REFERENCES








 
salt-movie
salt-movie
Figure 19
Click this figure caption button to see a MOVIE of the anti-aliased 3-D migrated salt data!



 
next up [*] print clean
Next: About this document ... Up: Table of Contents
Stanford Exploration Project
5/15/2001