|
|
|
|
Subsalt imaging by target-oriented wavefield least-squares migration: A 3-D field-data example |
As derived in Appendix A, each component of the the 3-D conical-wave domain Hessian reads
is the source signature at frequency
The diagonal part of the Hessian (when
), which contains autocorrelations
of both source and receiver-side Green's functions, can be interpreted as a subsurface illumination
map with contributions from both sources and receivers. The rows of the Hessian (for fixed
's
and varying
), which contains crosscorrelations of both source and receiver-side Green's
functions, can be interpreted as resolution functions (Tang, 2009; Lecomte, 2008). They measure
how much smearing an image can have due to a given acquisition setup.
The exact Hessian defined by equation 3, however, is nontrivial and very expensive to implement.
It requires either storing a huge number of Green's functions for reuse, or performing
a large number of wavefield propagations to repeatedly calculate the Green's functions, resulting in
a computational cost proportional to
, with
,
,
and
being the number of crossline shots,
inline conical waves, inline receivers and crossline receivers, respectively.
In order to reduce the computational cost,
we use the simultaneous phase-encoding technique to efficiently
calculate an approximate version of equation 3.
The simultaneous phase-encoding, however, is only strictly valid when the
acquisition
mask operator is independent along the encoding axes (Tang, 2009).
For the 3-D conical-wave-domain Hessian, the encoding axes are the inline source axis
and the
receiver axis
, respectively.
Ocean-bottom cable (OBC) and land acquisition geometries, where receivers are fixed for all sources, obviously
satisfy this condition. But marine-streamer acquisition geometry, where the receiver cable moves with sources,
apparently does not.
To make the theory applicable to the marine-streamer data case,
we assume that the receiver location
depends only on the crossline source position
,
but is independent of the inline source position
.
This implicitly assumes that for a fixed crossline
, all inline shots share the same receiver array.
Therefore, we can express the acquisition mask operator as a product of two separate functions:
Substituting equation 4 into equation 3 yields
is the receiver-side encoding function, to be specified later.
Equation 6 can be greatly simplified as follows:
and
is the velocity at image point
is the wavefield generated by propagating the conical-wave source
However, the phase-encoded Hessian brings unwanted crosstalk. This becomes clear by comparing equations 6
and 3. The crosstalk can be suppressed by carefully choosing the phase-encoding function
(Tang, 2009).
In this paper, we choose
to be a random phase-encoding function; thus
denotes the realization index of the random phase-encoding function.
It would be very easy to verify that, with this choice of encoding functions, the expectation of the crosstalk becomes zero.
Therefore,
equation 6 converges
to equation 5 by stacking over
, according to the law of large numbers (Gray and Davisson, 2003):
| (12) |
|
|
|
|
Subsalt imaging by target-oriented wavefield least-squares migration: A 3-D field-data example |