|
|
|
|
Theory and practice of interpolation in the pyramid domain |
Figure 8a shows the data to interpolate with
its amplitude spectrum (Figure 8b). Many
methods exploit the
domain directly in order to
interpolate missing data [Abma and Kabir (2006); Xu et al. (2005); Zwartjes and Sacchi (2007)], with
or without nonuniform Fourier transforms. The interpolation result in
Figure 8c proves that the proposed algorithm
works in this case as well. The
domain in Figure
8d validates these findings.
Figure 9a and 9c display
the input data and the interpolation results, respectively. This
dataset is similar to the one used in Figure 6a. The
missing traces have been properly interpolated almost everywhere. Where
gaps are big, however, the proposed algorithm might have some
difficulties which could be overcome by using a multiscaling strategy.
Note, in Figures 9b and 9d,
the clean up of the
domain after interpolation.
Finally, we interpolate irregularly-spaced data for a field data
example shown in Figure 10a. This dataset was also
used in Figure 7a. Like what we observed in
the previous example, the interpolation result in Figure
10c exemplifies how the proposed algorithm can
interpolate missing data: the reconstructed traces look very similar
to the original ones. The
spectra in Figures
10b and 10d show the
attenuation of artifacts due to the random sampling in Figure 10a.
|
|
|
|
Theory and practice of interpolation in the pyramid domain |