Next: Description of the available
Up: Anisotropic migration velocity analysis
Previous: Geologic setting
Several imaging challenges associated with Alwyn are well
illustrated in Figure
that shows
the seismic crossline of the migrated cube obtained by
CGG in 2003 after isotropic Kirchoff prestack
migration. It shows the following different challenges encountered in
the area of interest:
- First, the reflectors and faults below the BCU horizon (strong
reflector at around 3.5 km depth) are moderately well focused.
- Second, a complex channel at around 1.0 km depth distorts the
underlying horizons and especially the Balder horizon (strong and
continuous reflector at around 1.5 km depth), affected by pull-ups
(for example, at inlines 630, 660 and 700).
- Third, strong multiples contaminate the lower part of the image
as well as strong migration smiles due to limited crossline
acquisition aperture.
Furthermore, anisotropy is commonly observed in the North Sea. In
the Alwyn field, the thick layer between the Top Chalk horizon (at around
2.2 km depth) and the BCU horizon is made of chalk, a sedimentary
carbonate rock whose main mineral (calcite) has an anisotropic
crystalline structure. The anisotropy of this layer, if not taken into
account in the migration, can result in poor imaging of the underlying layers.
Section_Crossline_1999
Figure 8
Crossline 1999 of CGG 2003 PSDM cube obtained after isotropic
Kirchhoff prestack migration. The distance between two inlines is
equal to 18.75m.
Next: Description of the available
Up: Anisotropic migration velocity analysis
Previous: Geologic setting
Stanford Exploration Project
5/6/2007