Next: Synthetic tests
Up: Artman and Fomel: Fourier
Previous: Introduction
The space-domain shot-profile imaging condition including subsurface
offset for shot-profile migration Rickett and Sava (2002) is
| ![\begin{displaymath}
I(x,h)\vert _{\omega,z}=U(x+h)\,D^*(x-h)\;,\end{displaymath}](img1.gif) |
(1) |
Where I is the migrated image produced by cross-correlating the
up-coming, U, and down-going, D, wavefields at every depth and
frequency. Both x and h can be areal vectors. * represents
complex conjugation. To derive the Fourier-domain equivalent, we will
perform a piece-wise proof and begin with the Fourier transform D*
to
(neglecting Fourier scaling)
| ![\begin{displaymath}
\hat{I}(x,h)=U(x+h)\,\int \hat{D}^*(k_s)\,e^{i\,k_s\,(x-h)}\,dk_s \;.\end{displaymath}](img3.gif) |
(2) |
Continue by Fourier transforming the variable x to find
| ![\begin{displaymath}
\hat{I}(k_x,h)=\int U(x+h)\,\int \hat{D}^*(k_s) e^{i\,k_s\,(x-h)}\,dk_s
e^{-i\,x\,k_x}\,dx \;.\end{displaymath}](img4.gif) |
(3) |
By reordering variables, the equivalent form
| ![\begin{eqnarray}
\nonumber
\hat{I}(k_x,h) & = & \int\hat{D}^*(k_s)\, e^{-i\,k_s\...
...\,h\,(k_x-2\,k_s)}
\int U(x')\,e^{-i\,x'\,(k_x-k_s)}\,d x'\,dk_s\end{eqnarray}](img5.gif) |
|
| (4) |
is achieved. From here, we can recognize the inner integral is the
Fourier transform of the wavefield U which can be replaced directly
to yield
| ![\begin{displaymath}
\hat{I}(k_x,h)= \int\hat{U}(k_x-k_s)\,\hat{D}^*(k_s)\,
e^{i\,h\,(k_x-2\,k_s)}\,dk_s \;.\end{displaymath}](img6.gif) |
(5) |
With the use of the definition of offset,
, we can
replace several of the above arguments with equivalent expressions to
find
| ![\begin{displaymath}
\hat{I}(k_x,h)= \frac{1}{2}\,\int\hat{U}\left(\frac{k_x+k_h}...
...hat{D}^*\left(\frac{k_x-k_h}{2}\right)\,e^{i\,h\,k_h}\,dk_h \;.\end{displaymath}](img8.gif) |
(6) |
The last integral is recognized as an inverse Fourier transform, this
time over the kh variable. Using this fact, we arrive at the
multi-dimensional (over x and h, which can be two-dimensional
themselves) Fourier transform of the general shot-profile imaging
condition
| ![\begin{displaymath}
\widehat{I}(k_x,k_h)=\frac{1}{2}\,\hat{U}\left(\frac{k_x+k_h}{2}\right)
\,\hat{D}^*\left(\frac{k_x-k_h}{2}\right)\;.\end{displaymath}](img9.gif) |
(7) |
From this equation, the result that the Fourier-domain equivalent to
the conventional space-domain imaging condition for shot-profile
migration is again a lagged multiplication of the up-coming and
down-going wavefields at each frequency and depth level. Evaluating
the arguments inside the wavefields to produce a component of the
image shows that the wavefields, in the wavenumber domain, will need
to be interpolated by a factor of two to calculate the image space
output. The Table 1 showing example calculations of the
components of the image space looks like
Table 1:
Layout of wavenumber components in Fourier-domain imaging conditions
![\begin{table}
\begin{displaymath}
k_h\end{displaymath}\begin{displaymath}
k_x
...
...{3}{2})\hat{D}^*(\frac{1}{2}) \\ \hline \end{array}\end{displaymath}\end{table}](img10.gif) |
Next: Synthetic tests
Up: Artman and Fomel: Fourier
Previous: Introduction
Stanford Exploration Project
5/3/2005