Next: 2-D Field Data Results
Up: Particular Implementation of LSJIMP
Previous: Velocity-Depth Ambiguity in the
Now that we have derived appropriate imaging and amplitude correction operators,
we are ready to translate the general LSJIMP modeling equation
(
) to my particular implementation. The primary image,
, is mapped into data space primary events by NMO,
.
Similarly, a given pegleg image,
, is mapped into data space by
sequentially applying the differential geometric spreading correction
(
), Snell resampling (
), HEMNO (
),
and finally, a reflection coefficient (
). Let us rewrite
equation (
) accordingly:
|  |
(28) |
We see that in equation (
), the analog to
in equation (
) is
.
The data residual weight in equation (
),
, can often
strongly influence the success of the inversion. Technically,
carries
a heavy burden: it must decorrelate and balance the residual. However, I have
found that a simpler form for
nontheless pays dividends. I set
, which has the same dimension as a CMP gather, to zero where the data,
, has an empty trace, and also above the onset of the seabed reflection.
Next: 2-D Field Data Results
Up: Particular Implementation of LSJIMP
Previous: Velocity-Depth Ambiguity in the
Stanford Exploration Project
5/30/2004