Next: Examples
Up: Sava and Fomel: WEMVA
Previous: Example
This section presents a brief physical interpretation of the various
members of relation (17).
Consider that we have recorded two wavefields at the top and bottom
of a depth slab:
W0, the wavefield at the top of the slab which has not propagated
through the anomalous region;
W1, the wavefield at the bottom of the slab which incorporates
scattering effects caused by the slowness anomaly inside the slab.
The goal of WEMVA is to extract the slowness perturbation
from
W0 and W1.
We can imagine that the linearized process can be thought of
as a succession of four steps.
- 1.
- Continuation of W0 and W1 to a level inside the slab
where we can compare the two wavefields. This level can be either
at the top, bottom or anywhere in between:
|  |
(37) |
kz represents the depth wavenumber and is a function of
the arbitrary slowness inside any given depth slab, and
is a scalar which defines where inside the slab
we continue the two wavefields.
- 2.
- Linearization of W0 and W1 with respect to the
slowness perturbation:
| ![\begin{displaymath}
W_1e^{ -\xi k_z\left(s_0\right)}{\left[1- \xi \b\Delta s\rig...
...\left(s_0\right)}{\left[1+\left(1-\xi\right)\b\Delta s\right]},\end{displaymath}](img83.gif) |
(38) |
where
is the function defined in Equation (12).
- 3.
- Datuming of the linearized wavefields to the bottom of
the slab:
| ![\begin{eqnarray}
W_1{\left[1- \xi \b\Delta s\right]} &=&
W_0{\left[1+\left(1-\x...
...\right)}
\\ &=&
W_b{\left[1+\left(1-\xi\right)\b\Delta s\right]}\end{eqnarray}](img85.gif) |
(39) |
| (40) |
- 4.
- Subtraction of the wavefield propagated through the
perturbed medium from the wavefield propagated through the
background medium:
|  |
(41) |
All three cases in Equation (14) can be derived from
Equation (41) as follows:
|  |
(42) |
| (43) |
| (44) |
Next: Examples
Up: Sava and Fomel: WEMVA
Previous: Example
Stanford Exploration Project
6/7/2002