previous up next print clean
Next: Model-space inverse versus data-space Up: Problem formulation Previous: Theory

The cross-product filter

The inverse of LTL (LLT) filters the model (data) space to correct the adjoint operator for the interdependencies between model (data) elements. Each element Aij of LTL (LLT) describes the correlation between the model parameter mi (data parameter di) and the model parameter mj (data parameter dj). Chemingui and Biondi 1997 showed that the cross-product matrix is, in short, an AMO matrix. We write the cross-product filter $\bf A$ in terms of its AMO elements as

\begin{displaymath}
{\bf A}= \left[
 \begin{array}
{ccccc}
I & A_{(h_1,h_2)} & A...
 ... A_{(h_n,h_3)} &...... & I
 \end{array} \right]
\EQNLABEL{equ7}\end{displaymath} (6)

where A(hi,hj) is the AMO from input offset hi to output offset hj and, I is the identity operator (mapping from hi to hi). Comforming to the definition of AMO Biondi et al. (1996), A(hi,hj) is the adjoint of A(hj,hi). Therefore, the filter $\bf A$ is Hermitian with diagonal elements being the identity and off-diagonal elements being AMO transforms.

This is the fundamental definition of A that will allow a fast and efficient numerical approximation of its inverse, and thus of the whole prestack imaging inverse problem. Since AMO has a narrow operator, the cost of applying it to prestack data is almost negligible compared to that of other imaging operators, such as prestack migration. When the azimuth rotation or the offset continuation is small, as is the case for geometry regularization problems, the size of the operator is very small. Biondi et al 1996 discussed the design of an efficient implementation of the AMO operator that saves computation by properly limiting the spatial extent of the numerical integration.



 
previous up next print clean
Next: Model-space inverse versus data-space Up: Problem formulation Previous: Theory
Stanford Exploration Project
10/9/1997