previous up next print clean
Next: Velocity-Independent-Prestack Imaging Up: Bednar: EOM vs. DMO-PSI Previous: The Velocity Independent DMO

Velocity-Independent DMO

 Now define a new offset hg and time T1, as follows:

 
hg2 = h2 - b2, (10)

and  
 \begin{displaymath}
T_1^2 = T_0^2 + \frac{4h_g^2}{v^2}.\end{displaymath} (11)
Then after rearranging (9), one has  
 \begin{displaymath}
T_1 = \frac{h_g}{h}T,\end{displaymath} (12)
Equations (10), (11), and (12) define velocity-independent DMO. They provide the framework for mapping traces with offset h and midpont m to zero-offset traces with offset hg and midpoint m + b. Note that this process requires no velocity information and can be accomplished by a careful sampling or ``binning'' of b Gardner (1993). The trajectory of a single time sample T for a trace with half-offset h in the new offset space hg is shown in Figure [*].

 
Fig2
Fig2
Figure 2
Radial-plane DMO.
view

Each fixed sample in (m,h,t) space is mapped to a curve in (m+b,hg,t) space. Here, the curve lies in a radial plane, within the data volume (m,h,t), defined by $h = \frac{h_g}{T_1}t$. It is possible to show Gardner (1993) that the mapping can be accomplished by (f,k) migration of the radial-plane data with the "velocity" $\frac{h_g}{T_1}$.Thus, the computational requirements for velocity-independent DMO are $O(n \log n)$. Although it is not within the scope of this article, Gardner 1993 also provides a log-stretch-(f,k) version of this DMO when h (common-offset section) is fixed.

After DMO, the new output volume consists of zero-offset but unmigrated data. Arrival times are specified by (11) and as a result are completely hyperbolic functions of hg. The new data set can be NMO corrected, and stacked, to produce a zero-offset section. Any form of standard time migration may then be applied to produce a proper subsurface image.

Note also that if each new equivalent offset is migrated after NMO but prior to stack, then each point on the diffraction curve of Figure [*] will result in one of the circles indicated in Figure [*]. After stack, the envelope of the circles, as also indicated in Figure [*], will be the equal-traveltime ellipse of (2). Since the radii of each of these circles is given by the velocity-independent equation (7), one can postulate that constant-velocity-prestack imaging requires no initial velocity information.

 
Fig3
Fig3
Figure 3
Ellipse as envelope of circles.
view


previous up next print clean
Next: Velocity-Independent-Prestack Imaging Up: Bednar: EOM vs. DMO-PSI Previous: The Velocity Independent DMO
Stanford Exploration Project
10/10/1997