next up previous print clean
Next: Dip Estimation Up: The Method Previous: The Method

Discretizing the problem

Claerbout approximates the derivatives of equation (1) with 2x2 finite difference stencils. Assuming that the grid spacing in both the t and x directions are unity:  
 \begin{displaymath}
\frac{\partial}{\partial x} \approx
 0.5*
 \left[\begin{arra...
 ...eft[\begin{array}
{rr}
 -1 & -1 \\  1 & 1 
 \end{array}\right].\end{displaymath} (4)
By convolving together these first-order stencils, we can construct appropriate finite-difference stencils to approximate the second-order differential operators of equation (3):
         \begin{eqnarray}
\frac{\partial}{\partial x}*\frac{\partial}{\partial x} 
 = \fr...
 ...-1 & -2 & -1 \\  2 & 4 & 2 \\  -1 & -2 & -1 \\  \end{array}\right]\end{eqnarray} (5)
(6)
(7)
The stencils of equations (5)-(7) are convolved with the data, $\bf u$. For simplicity, we can define the following notation:  
 \begin{displaymath}
\frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^2}*\bold u = \bold D_{xx} ; \hs...
 ....2in}
 \frac{\partial^2}{\partial t^2}*\bold u = \bold D_{tt}
,\end{displaymath} (8)
and rewrite equation (3) in matrix form:  
 \begin{displaymath}
\bold r = 
 \left[\begin{array}
{rrr}
 \bold D_{xx} & \bold ...
 ...n{array}
{c}
 1 \\  p_1+p_2 \\  p_1 p_2 \\  \end{array}\right].\end{displaymath} (9)
The vector $\bf r$ has the same dimension as the data, $\bf u$.If the data consists only of plane waves with slopes p1 and p2, then equation (9) predicts values of $\bf u$ from nearby values of $\bf u$. If the data's slopes change in time and space, however, equation (9) is valid only across local ``patches'' of the data. We can rewrite equation (9) to reflect this fact:  
 \begin{displaymath}
\bold r = 
 \left[\begin{array}
{ccc}
 \bold D^1_{xx} & \bol...
 ...in{array}
{c}
 1 \\  p_1+p_2 \\  p_1 p_2 \\  \end{array}\right]\end{displaymath} (10)
Equation (10) denotes the convolution of the respective finite-difference stencils over a data patch of size n, where n may be as large as the entire data, or as small as $3 \times 3$

While it is tempting to make a change of variables (a=p1+p2, b=p1 p2) and treat equation (10) as a linear relationship, I have found that this approach produces trivial coupled estimates of the true slopes. This problem is inherently nonlinear.


next up previous print clean
Next: Dip Estimation Up: The Method Previous: The Method
Stanford Exploration Project
11/11/2002