next up previous print clean
Next: Clapp: REFERENCESVelocity uncertainty Up: Appendix Previous: New notations and definitions

Downward continuation

Given the values of the function 472#472, downward continuation consists of finding the values of 473#473. An expression describing this process lays at the end of the following proof: Obtain the Helmholtz equation by applying the Fourier transform defined by ([*]) to the wave equation ([*]) while taking into account the notation ([*]) and the property ([*]) and rearranging:  
 474#474 (198)
By derivating relation ([*]) with respect to x and z we obtain:  
 475#475 (199)
 
 476#476 (200)
 
 477#477 (201)
 
 478#478 (202)
By plugging into in ([*]) and eliminating the exponential, we get:  
 479#479 (203)
The second derivative with respect to z can be eliminated by derivating with respect to z, multiplying by 480#480, and adding the result to ([*]):  
 481#481 (204)
Note that no approximation has been made between the wave equation ([*]) and this point. Eq. [*] is simply the wave equation in a different coordinate system. Now Qzzz is approximated by zero:  
 482#482 (205)
For the case of a homogenous medium, 483#483 and the equation turns into the familiar 429#429 equation:  
 484#484 (206)
The 444#444 equation is obtained by neglecting the Qxxz term also:  
 485#485 (207)
Downward continuation proceeds by considering  
 486#486 (208)
then by using one of the equations [*], [*] or [*] to find the values of 487#487 and by finally finding P by undoing the variable change:  
 488#488 (209)


next up previous print clean
Next: Clapp: REFERENCESVelocity uncertainty Up: Appendix Previous: New notations and definitions
Stanford Exploration Project
6/7/2002