next up previous print clean
Next: Additional pre-processing steps Up: Signal-noise separation Previous: Implementing the data processing

Testing the processing sequence

Data collected by () was designed to record the interface response and coseismic energy separately as a test data set for processing. However, these files lack any additional interface response events after the onset of coseismic energy (Figure [*]a). In an electroseismic data set collected with a standard geometry, we would be looking for interface response events within the coseismic energy. For that reason, we followed the example of () and constructed a test data file by windowing out (Figure [*]b) the interface response from a record (Figure [*]a) using a sin2 taper in the time direction and adding it to the original file within the coseismic energy. We did this twice (Figure [*]c), adding the synthetic arrival at two different times in the record. The resulting record (Figure [*]d) appears essentially identical to the original file, but contains two interface response events hidden within to test our methodology.

 
fake
fake
Figure 6
(a) Data file. (b) Interface response (IR) from (a), windowed with sin2 taper. (c) Two IR events to be added to data. (d) Test data- starting data plus two added events.
[*] view burn build edit restore

Using the PEF design windows shown (Figure [*]b and c), and the parameters mentioned above, we solve the inverse problem (equation [*]). Figure [*]d shows 363#363, our best estimate of 343#343, the component of the data that is made up of the interface response energy. The two added interface response events are evident, as is the original interface response. Unfortunately, a considerable amount of dipping coseismic energy still remains between 0.025 and 0.04 seconds, and the added event below 0.06 seconds is somewhat weak. Despite these shortcomings, the final result (Figure [*]d) is considerably better than the original data file ([*]a).

 
nice
nice
Figure 7
(a) Data file (windowed version of file in [*]d). (b)Window to be used for determination of signal PEF 332#332. (c)Window used for determination of noise PEF 338#338. (d) Output of processing, 357#357. Note that added horizontal events 0.045 s and 0.065 s are visible.
[*] view burn build edit restore


next up previous print clean
Next: Additional pre-processing steps Up: Signal-noise separation Previous: Implementing the data processing
Stanford Exploration Project
6/7/2002