next up previous print clean
Next: Initial Errors Up: Data Previous: Preprocessing

Common Azimuth Migration

The cost of full wave equation migration is still prohibitive. As a result, several methods have been developed that sacrifice accuracy for computational efficiency. One method, offset plane wave migration (, ), decomposes the wave field into constant $\frac{kx}{\omega}$ waves and then downward continues each plane wave independently. Unfortunately, offset plane migration quickly deteriorates in media that vary from v(z) (). I chose to instead use another method that has been developed to do 3-D prestack migration economically, Common Azimuth Migration. In CAM each azimuth is migrated independently, with the assumption that the source and receivers stay in the same plane while being downward continued (Figure 2). () showed that CAM only starts to loose accuracy when beds dip more than 60 degrees at 45 azimuth from the recording geometry. For velocity analysis I felt that this was an acceptable limitation.

 
comaz-down
Figure 2
Geometry of the source and receiver rays for common-azimuth downward continuation. CAM assumes that if the source and receivers are downward continued the downward continued positions will always lay in the same slanted plane. Figure taken from ()
comaz-down
view burn build edit restore


next up previous print clean
Next: Initial Errors Up: Data Previous: Preprocessing
Stanford Exploration Project
4/29/2001