|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Finland--|
| Denmark |
| |
| |
| NewZealand Sweden |
| Canada |
Singapore Norway |
| Netherlands Iceland|
| UK |
| Switzerland |
| Luxembourg |
| Australia |
| |
| |
| |
| HongKong USA Austria |
| Germany |
| Chile |
| |
| Ireland |
| Spain |
| |
| France |
| Israel Portugal |
| Japan |
| |
| Belgium |
| Botswana |
| |
| Estonia |
| Taiwan Slovenia |
| CostaRica Namibia |
| Tunisia Hungary |
| |
| Greece S.Africa |
| Malaysia Morocco |
| Mauritius Jordan Italy |
| |
| Peru Czechia |
| ElSalvador Lithuania |
| Malawi S.Korea Poland |
| Brazil Belarus |
| Turkey Croatia |
| Senegal Slovakia |
| Ghana Zambia Argentina Bulgaria Latvia |
| Mexico China |
| Ethiopia Thailand Egypt |
| BurkinaFaso Zimbabwe Kazakhstan |
| Venezuela Philippines India Romania |
| IvoryCoast Bolivia |
| Ecuador Tanzania Vietnam Armenia Moldova |
| Uzbekistan |
| Uganda Mozambique |
Kenya Russia |
| Cameroon |
| |
Indonesia Angola |
| Azerbaijan Ukraine |
| Yugoslavia |
|----------Nigeria-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Anticorruption (http://www.transparency.de/) versus latitude (year 2000)
Regarding corruption, using 2000 data from Transparency International, I plotted anticorruption versus latitude. Actually, my more recent plot of transparency versus wealth shows a much more convincing correlation than transparany versus latitude. But does wealth cause transparency or does transparency cause wealth? Probably neither. I've discovered the Lynn and Vanhanen IQ data for countries. I should make some plots to try to figure out which is more tightly bound, anticorruption and IQ, or anticorruption and wealth.