Next: Two-step solution
Up: Rickett, et al.: STANFORD
Previous: Normalizing vs scaling of
Using the definition of data-space pseudo inverse, Chemingui and Biondi
(1997) presented a new technique to invert for
reflectivity models while correcting for the effects of irregular
sampling. The final reflectivity model is a two step solution
where the data is equalized in a first stage with an inverse filter
and an imaging operator is then applied to the equalized data to
invert for a model.
We start from the definition for the
data-space inverse solution
|  |
(53) |
then considering an irregularly sampled input of n seismic traces
and letting
be the operator that maps trace di
into the model space
, we write the cross-product matrix
as
| ![\begin{displaymath}
\bf L\bf L^T = \left[
\begin{array}
{cccc}
\left[ \bf L_{(...
...\bf L^T_{(m,d_n)}\right]
\end{array} \right]
\EQNLABEL{equ6}\end{displaymath}](img194.gif) |
(54) |
Each inner product
is therefore a
reconstruction of a data trace with input offset hi as a new trace with
offset hj. We recognize this mapping as an AMO
transformation. We name this cross product filter A,
and we write it
in terms of its AMO elements as
| ![\begin{displaymath}
{\bf A}= \left[
\begin{array}
{ccccc}
\bf I & \bf A_{(h_1,...
...h_n,h_3)} &...... & \bf I
\end{array} \right]
\EQNLABEL{equ7}\end{displaymath}](img196.gif) |
(55) |
where
is AMO from input offset hi to output offset hj
and,
is the identity operator (mapping from hi to hi). Conforming
to the definition of AMO (),
is the adjoint of
;
therefore, the filter
is Hermitian
with diagonal elements being the identity and off-diagonal elements being
AMO transforms.
Next: Two-step solution
Up: Rickett, et al.: STANFORD
Previous: Normalizing vs scaling of
Stanford Exploration Project
7/5/1998