Next: Preprocessing
Up: Alvarez and Biondi: 3D
Previous: Description of the Synthetic
The original dataset contains 6,764,207 traces (about 44 GB).
Choosing a small, meaningful, ``complete'' subset of data for source-receiver
migration, however, is not trivial, because the geometry of acquisition
makes the offset distribution of adjacent CMPs in both inline and crossline
directions different. This is illustrated in Figure
which
shows the offset distribution inline for a few adjacent CMPs. Only every
fourth CMP the offset distribution repeats. Although not shown, the situation
in the crossline direction is worse. There are
20 different crossline offsets (from -475 to 475 m), but for any CMP line taken
at a fixed crossline position, all traces correspond to the same crossline offset.
The input to the source-receiver migration algorithm is a regular 5-D cube

where
is the vector of surface position,
is the vector
of surface offsets and t is the traveltime. In order to create such a cube,
even for a small dataset, a large number of null traces need to be inserted.
For example, for a 4 by 4 kms of full-fold CMP data we will have:
51200 CMPs (at 12.5 by 25 m) each with 240 inline offsets (100 to 6075 m
offsets at 25 m sampling) and 20 crossline offsets (-475 to 475 m
offsets at 25 m sampling) for a total of 440 million traces!. Since each
trace has 1751 samples (7 seconds at 4 ms sampling interval), this means
a dataset of almost 800 GB.
sketch3
Figure 6 Schematic showing the unequal offset
distribution of adjacent CMPs in the inline direction. The stars represent
the receivers and the small circles represent the CMP positions. The table on
bottom left side lists the offset distribution of a few traces corresponding
to four arbitrary adjacent CMPs numbered 1 to 4 as indicated by the arrows.
Notice that the adjacent CMPs have different offset distribution.
In order to make a more manageable dataset, further data reduction is
necessary. Here we are particularly interested in the effect of crossline
dip in the moveout of the multiples after migration, therefore we chose
to subsample the data in the inline coordinates only. We subsampled the
inline CMP axis such that every other CMP was discarded. This has the advantage
of not only halving the number of CMPs but also halving the number of inline
offsets as can be seen in Figure
since now the inline
offset interval is 50 m rather than 25 m. We also subsampled the time
axis to 16 ms, which required that the
data be filtered to a maximum frequency of 32 Hz even though the original
wavelet had frequencies up to about 60 Hz as shown in
Figure
. This is appropriate in this case because vertical
resolution is not critical for our purposes. Finally, we limited the inline
offsets to 4000 m which sacrifices the steeper flanks of the moveout of the
multiples as shown in Figure
. With these reductions, the
dataset size becomes about 70 GB after some padding in all spatial directions
to avoid or at least lessen migration artifacts.
Figure
shows a near offset cube of the five-dimensional
selected dataset. Notice
that there are only six crossline CMPs for a given inline CMP location,
corresponding to the six sail lines, and there is no data redundancy in the
crossline direction. Similarly, only every other inline CMP position has a
trace with a given crossline CMP location because of the dual shot geometry.
Panel (a) of Figure
shows the inline and distribution
of offsets for
an inline CMP section taken at crossline CMP position 2212.5 and crossline
offset of -12.5 m. Here again we note the on-off pattern of the offset
distribution due to the dual shot source as indicated in the sketch in
Figure
. Similarly, panel (b) of Figure
shows the distribution of crossline offsets
for a CMP section in the crossline direction taken at inline CMP location
8400 and inline offset of 100 m.
zoff1
Figure 7 Near offset cube (50 m offset inline and -12.5
offset crossline) of the selected dataset.
inline-xline
Figure 8 Left panel: inline distribution of offsets
for an inline CMP section taken at crossline CMP location 2212.5 and
at -12.5 m crossline offset. Right panel: crossline distribution of offsets
for a crossline CMP section taken at inline CMP location 8400 and at
100 m inline offset.
Next: Preprocessing
Up: Alvarez and Biondi: 3D
Previous: Description of the Synthetic
Stanford Exploration Project
4/6/2006