-
compare the impulse responses of our algorithm with those of anisotropic
phase shift method.
The medium is a homogeneous, tilted TI medium.
The symmetry axis of the medium is in the (x,z) plane and is tilted
shows a depth slice of the impulse responses at z=1500 m.
Figure
(a) is obtained with our algorithm
and Figure
(b) is obtained with the anisotropic phase-shift method.
First, Figure
(a) is very similar to
(b). Second, the depth slice of the impulse response
is not a circle. The wave propagates faster in y than in x direction. Third, the impulse location
x=2000 m and y=2000 m is not the center of the impulse response. The impulse response is symmetric along y=2000m,
but it is not symmetric along x=2000 m.
![]() |
Figure
shows an in-line slice of the impulse responses at y=2000 m.
Figure
(a) is obtained with our algorithm and Figure
(b) is obtained
with the anisotropic phase-shift method.
Figure
shows a cross-line slice of the impulse responses at x=2000 m.
Figure
(a) is obtained with our algorithm and Figure
(b) is obtained
with the anisotropic phase-shift method. From Figure
and
, we can see that
the impulse of our algorithm is very close to that of the anisotropic phase-shift method at low-angle energy
and is different from the the anisotropic phase-shift method at high-angle energy. Since the medium is
homogeneous, the anisotropic phase-shift method is accurate. So our algorithm is accurate for the energy up
to
in the impulse response, compared to the anisotropic phase-shift method.