Next: Appendix B
Up: Appendix A - Analytical
Previous: Appendix A - Analytical
The application to the isotropic case is simpler
than the anisotropic case because the derivative
of the path length is zero,
but it is instructive since it verifies known results
through a completely different derivation.
Substituting
equations 51 into
equation 49,
I obtain:
| ![\begin{eqnarray}
\left.
\frac{\partial z_\xi}{\partial h_\xi}
\right\vert _{m_\x...
...n ^2\alpha_x\tan ^2 \gamma
\right]
}
\nonumber
\\ &=&
\tan \gamma,\end{eqnarray}](img95.gif) |
|
| |
| (54) |
which shows that
is independent from the dip angle
.This expression is consistent with the 2-D analysis
by Sava and Fomel (2003) and
the 3-D analysis by
by Biondi and Tisserant (2004).
Next: Appendix B
Up: Appendix A - Analytical
Previous: Appendix A - Analytical
Stanford Exploration Project
5/3/2005