IN THE Constitutional Council of the Associated Students of Stanford University MIKEY LEE, Petitioner, v. SIXTH UNDERGRAUATE SENATE, of the Associated Students of Stanford University, Respondent. Amicus Curiae Brief Ray J Rivera Associated Students of Stanford University Nominations Commission rjrivera@stanford.edu Pro se Interest of Amicus Curiae This brief is filed in the interest of the cohesion and robustness of the Association and the integrity of the mandate of the Association voters, and in disinterest of any Executive slate or party named or implied in the foregoing case, or in Mefford v. Fifth Undergraduate Senate. Argument Jurisdiction must be established before any case can be adjudicated. Failure to establish jurisdiction may result in misapplication of any binding force or other power of the Constitutional Council, such that immune parties may be falsely enjoined or censured. Establishment of jurisdiction is therefore a necessary primary stage of any litigation, and it is the responsibility of the court to demarcate its reach before parties in a suit present their evidence. In neither Mefford v. Fifth Undergraduate Senate nor the foregoing suit has the Constitutional Council addressed the jurisdiction and review process of Constitutional Council cases. In particular, it is not resolved whether the Constitutional Council has jurisdiction over official, non-legislative actions of the Associated Students of Stanford University (ASSU) Undergraduate Senate. In corollary, because the Constitutional Council did not remand its opinion from Mefford v. Fifth Undergraduate Senate to an inferior body, it is not resolved whether (a) Constitution Council opinion has binding force on all Senate actions; nor (b) there inheres any obligation by the ASSU Undergraduate Senate to abide by articles of a Constitutional Council opinion rendered upon official non-legislative matters. Conclusion Since neither the petitioner nor the defendant in Mefford v. Fifth Undergraduate Senate demanded the Constitutional Council establish its jurisdiction, it is incumbent on the Constitutional Council to assume the interest of both the petitioner and the respondent in the foregoing suit. Specifically, the Constitutional Council must establish its jurisdiction over official non-legislative actions of the ASSU Undergraduate Senate, and the procedure for remanding opinions, before the petitioner or defendant are allowed to present their evidence. Respectfully submitted. Ray J Rivera Pro se