![]() |
(2) | |
| (3) | ||
| (4) | ||
| (5) | ||
| (6) |
The relative contrasts in P-impedance, S-impedance and density are given
by
and
, respectively.
is the reflection angle and
is an
estimate of the background shear to compressional velocity ratio
.
The reflectivity curves corresponding to either a unit perturbation in
P-impedance contrast (
),
S-impedance contrast or
density contrast can be seen in Figure
.
For a unit perturbation in relative P-impedance contrast, the P-impedance
inversion curve dominates at small angles of incidence and increases
with increasing offset. For a unit perturbation in relative S-impedance
contrast, the S-impedance inversion curve is zero at normal incidence and
is increasingly negative with increasing offset. Over the conventional range
of surface reflection data acquisition geometry illumination, which is
typically
to
, the density inversion curve is not significant,
as most of the density contrast contributes to the reflection AVO through the
impedance contrasts alone. As the reflection amplitudes are mostly a
combination of the P- and S-impedance contrast inversion curves, reflectors
with P- and S-impedance contrasts of the same polarity and magnitude are
expected to show approximately constant amplitude versus offset. On the
other hand, reflectors with P- and S-impedance contrasts of opposite
polarities, indicating a transition zone of changing rock pore fluid
properties, should show increasing amplitudes versus
offset.
![]() |