Next: About this document ...
Up: Reproducible Documents
Previous: Image Depth in ADCIGs
Residual Moveout in ADCIGs
In this appendix I show that, for a flat reflector, the residual
moveout of the multiples in ADCIGs reduces to the tangent-squared
expression derived by Biondi and Symes (2004) for the residual
moveout of under-migrated primaries:
 |
(7) |
Start with Equation
![\begin{displaymath}
z_{\xi_\gamma}=\frac{z_{\xi_\gamma}(0)}{1+\rho}\left[1+\frac...
...2-(1-\rho^2)\tan^2\gamma)}{\sqrt{\rho^2-\sin^2\gamma}}\right],
\end{displaymath}](img34.png) |
(8) |
where
is the normal-incidence migrated-depth,
(i.e.
) in the previous equations.
There is an important and unfortunate
difference in notation here, however, because
in equation A-1
is the ratio of the migration to the true slowness
whereas
in equation A-2 is the ratio of the migration to the true
velocity. Therefore, in order to get a better idea of how the approximation
for the RMO of the multiples (accounting for ray bending at the reflector
interface) relates to that of the primaries (neglecting ray bending), I rewrite
equation A-2 replacing
by
and
with
to get:
![\begin{displaymath}
z_{\xi_\gamma}=\left[\rho+\frac{\cos\gamma(1-(\rho^2-1)\tan^2\gamma)}{\sqrt{1-\rho^2\sin^2\gamma}}\right]\frac{z_0}{1+\rho}.
\end{displaymath}](img38.png) |
(9) |
Since
we get:
![\begin{displaymath}
\Delta n_{\mbox{RMO}}=\left[1-\frac{\cos\gamma(1-(\rho^2-1)\...
...\gamma}{\sqrt{1-\rho^2\sin^2\gamma}}\right]\frac{z_0}{1+\rho}.
\end{displaymath}](img40.png) |
(10) |
For small
,
and
, therefore
 |
(11) |
This is the same as equation A-1 save for the unit vector
. This result is intuitively appealing
because it shows that the approximation of neglecting ray bending at the
reflecting interface deteriorates as the aperture angle increases which is
when the ray bending is larger.
Next: About this document ...
Up: Reproducible Documents
Previous: Image Depth in ADCIGs
2007-10-24