Given the operators I have chosen to use in this experiment, selecting data
to test is straightforward. I need data that will result in a model
that requires interpolation and will make differences in frequency content of
various results obvious. Since the regularization operator is a steering operator,
the data can have varying dips. To meet these simple requirements, I chose to
take a 2-D slice from the familiar ``qdome'' model Claerbout (1995). The masking operator
contains enough zeros to defeat the inversion operator, making
the regularization operator necessary. Figure
shows the data
multiplied by the masking operator (
) I used for this experiment.
I am displaying it this way to make comparison with the inversion results simpler.
Figure
also shows the ``ideal'' model that would be obtained if
was simply an identity operator.
![]() |