next up previous print clean
Next: SIMPLE EXAMPLE Up: Rickett, et al.: STANFORD Previous: INTRODUCTION

BASIC IDEA

Assuming a v(z) earth with flat reflectors, we can define the theoretical RMS velocities by
\begin{displaymath}
\bold C\bold u \quad = \quad\bold d .\end{displaymath} (71)
where
$\bold C$
is the matrix of causal integration, a lower triangular matrix of ones.
$\bold D$
is the matrix of causal differentiation, namely, $\bold D=\bold C^{-1}$.
$\bold u$
is a vector whose components range over the vertical traveltime depth $\tau$,and whose component values contain the interval velocity squared $v_{\rm interval}^2 $.
$\bold d$
is a data vector whose components range over the vertical travel time depth $\tau$,and whose component values contain the scaled RMS velocity squared $\tau v_{\rm RMS}^2/\Delta \tau $where $\tau /\Delta \tau $ is the index on the time axis.

Start from a CMP gather q(t,i) moveout corrected with velocity v. A good starting guess for our RMS velocity function is the maximum ``instantaneous stack energy''
\begin{displaymath}
{\rm stack(t,v)} = \sum_{i=0}^n q(t,i) .\end{displaymath} (72)
An alternate starting guess for our RMS velocity function is the conventional one of maximum semblance
\begin{displaymath}
{\rm semb(t,v)} = {{1\over n}\sum_{i=1}^n q(t,i) \over
\sqrt{ {1\over n} \sum_{i=1}^n q(t,i)^2}}.\end{displaymath} (73)
In addition to the RMS velocities we need a diagonal weighting matrix $\bold W$,again found from stack energy or semblance, that differentiates between RMS velocities which we have confidence in (at reflectors) and ones that are more a function of noise in the data. Our data fitting goal is to minimize the residual
\begin{displaymath}
\bold 0
\quad\approx\quad
\bold W
\left[
\bold C\bold u
-
\bold d
\right] .\end{displaymath} (74)
Because we are multiplying our RMS function by $\tau$, we must must make a slight change in our weighting function to give early times approximately the same priority as later times.
\begin{displaymath}
\bold{W'} = {\Delta \tau \over \tau} \bold{W}\end{displaymath} (75)
To find the interval velocity where there is no data (where the stack power theoretically vanishes) we have the ``model damping'' goal to minimize the wiggliness $\bold p$of the squared interval velocity $\bold u$ where $\bold p$ equals
\begin{displaymath}
\bold 0
\quad\approx\quad
\bold D \bold u \quad = \quad\bold p .\end{displaymath} (76)

To speed convergence we ``precondition'' these goals () by changing the optimization variable from interval velocity squared $\bold u$ to its wiggliness $\bold p$.Substituting $\bold u=\bold C\bold p$ gives the two goals expressed as a function of wiggliness $\bold p$.
      \begin{eqnarray}
\bold 0
&\approx&
\bold W'
\left[
\bold C^2\bold p
-
\bold d
\right]
\\ \bold 0
&\approx&
\epsilon \bold p .\end{eqnarray} (77)
(78)


next up previous print clean
Next: SIMPLE EXAMPLE Up: Rickett, et al.: STANFORD Previous: INTRODUCTION
Stanford Exploration Project
7/5/1998