next up previous print clean
Next: Results and conclusions Up: Rickett, et al.: STANFORD Previous: Geometry

Data processing

Figure [*] shows a super-gather, consisting of all the traces in the survey binned as a function of offset. The left panel shows the raw data, and the center panel shows the same data after pre-processing.

 
sgather
sgather
Figure 5
Super-gather: entire dataset stacked into offset bins. Left panel shows raw data, center panel show processed data after pre-processing, and right panel shows semblance scan
view burn build edit restore

We processed the data with our in-house software, SEPlib3D, which provides a flexible environment for research in 3-D seismology. The simple processing flow consisted of:

1.
Trace edits
2.
Groundroll removal: A low-cut filter was sufficient to remove the groundroll. See Figure [*] for its impulse response and spectrum.
3.
Top mute to remove the refracted arrivals.
4.
Time-varying gain correction: tpow=2.
5.
NMO and stack: The right panel of Figure [*] shows a semblance scan from the super-gather. The velocity information provided by the 3-D dataset was limited by the small maximum offset. However, the small maximum offset also means the dataset is not very sensitive to move-out velocity. In any case, NMO was applied with a constant velocity of 240 m/s, the RMS velocity of the water-table reflector, which had been more accurately estimated from the larger offset 2-D surveys.

 
impulse
Figure 6
Impulse response of low-cut filter.
impulse
view burn build edit restore


next up previous print clean
Next: Results and conclusions Up: Rickett, et al.: STANFORD Previous: Geometry
Stanford Exploration Project
7/5/1998