previous up next print clean
Next: Testing for Kirchhoff migration Up: Migration algorithm Previous: Constant velocity sections

Variable velocity sections

The migration algorithm was adapted to handle variations in migration velocity (which is equivalent to rms velocity) with observed travel times and spatial locations. This was done by defining the velocity as a function of observation time and space, respectively. Illustrations for both cases shall be made on the same dipping reflector model shown in Figure 6.

 
f3-11a
f3-11a
Figure 6
Dipping reflector (dip, 8 ms/trace).


view

 
f3-15a
f3-15a
Figure 7
Zero-offset seismic response of dipping reflector model (velocity function, time-variant).


view

 
f3-15b
f3-15b
Figure 8
Output migrated section of Figure 7.


view

Figure 7 shows the zero-offset seismic response of this model. The velocity function used was taken from a real seismic data record section, and it varies only with observation time. The same velocity function was used to migrate this section, and the output record is shown in Figure 8. The dipping reflector is correctly repositioned, temporally and spatially, to its true subsurface location.

The same results were obtained when spatial variations in velocity were taken into account. The migrated output section (Figure 10) of the zero-offset section shown in Figure 9 is the correct image of the model dipping reflector.

 
f3-16a
f3-16a
Figure 9
Zero-offset seismic response of dipping reflector model (velocity function, space-variant).


view

 
f3-16b
f3-16b
Figure 10
Output migrated section of Figure 9.


view

Thus it has been shown that if the velocity function is known accurately both in observation time and spatial location, Kirchhoff migration is performed successfully on stacked data. Similar results can be shown for the case of non-zero offset data.


previous up next print clean
Next: Testing for Kirchhoff migration Up: Migration algorithm Previous: Constant velocity sections
Stanford Exploration Project
11/11/1997